Infection Control and Barrier Precautions - 4 Contact Hours
(New York Provider ID# IC 145, as Mandated by Chapter 786 of the New York Laws of 1992)
- Case Study
- New York State Requirements for Adherence to Infection Control Standards
- Transmission of Infectious Pathogens
- Antibiotic-Resistant Organisms
- Prevention of Exposure to Infectious Pathogens
- Development and Maintenance of a Safe Environment
- Staff Education: Basics
- Cleaning, Disinfection, and Sterilization
- Cleaning and Disinfecting Environmental Surfaces in Healthcare Facilities
- Indications for Sterilization, High-Level Disinfection, and Low-Level Disinfection
- Selection and Use of Low-Level Disinfectants for Non-critical Patient-Care Devices
- Disinfectant Fogging
- High-Level Disinfection of Endoscopes
- Disinfection Strategies for Other Semi-Critical Devices
- Methods of Sterilization
- Monitoring of Sterilizers
- Load Configuration
- Storage of Sterile Items
- Quality Control
- Flash Sterilization
- Steam Sterilization
- Reuse of Single-Use Medical Devices
- Microbial Contamination of Disinfectants
- Disinfection in Ambulatory Care, Home Care, and the Home
- Engineering and Environmental Controls
- Management of Equipment and Surfaces in Dentistry
- Selected Issues in Infection Control and Prevention: Diseases/Conditions
- Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
- Preventing Aspiration
- Primary Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Legionnaires Disease
- Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Pertussis
- Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis
- Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Adenovirus, Parainfluenza Virus, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections
- Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Influenza
- Occupational Exposure to Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and HIV
- Sepsis Awareness and Education
≥92% of participants will know basic infection control procedures and techniques.
After completing this course, the learner will be able to:
Describe key definitions related to infection control.
Outline the components of various infection precautions.
Determine when specific PPE should be used.
Identify risk factors that increase the susceptibility to various infections.
Specify signs and symptoms of various infections.
Infection control is vital in controlling the transmission and spread of disease-causing pathogens in healthcare facilities. New York state requires registered nurses and other healthcare professionals practicing in the state to complete infection control training and understand and practice the proper infection control procedures. In addition, New York state requires registered nurses and other healthcare professionals to be educated about sepsis, signs and symptoms, risk factors, and treatment.
A registered nurse is starting an IV line. The first attempt is unsuccessful, and as the IV catheter is removed, the stylet punctures the nurse’s forefinger. Blood was visible on the stylet before the puncture occurred. The nurse was wearing gloves. The stylet punctured the tip of the finger, and it did not enter a large vein.
After discarding the IV catheter and placing a dressing over the insertion site, the nurse washes the area with soap and water, covers it with an adhesive bandage, and immediately goes to the hospital’s emergency department (ED). The time from the injury until he arrived in the ED was approximately 15 minutes.
A rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test is done, and testing for Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) is done, as well. The nurse is 33 years old; he has no past medical history, does not take any prescription medications, and has no risk factors for HBV, HCV, or HIV. He has been fully vaccinated against HBV.
The patient is a 65-year-old male who has been admitted for the treatment of heart failure. He does not have any factors that would now, or would have in the past, increase his risk of being infected with HBV, HCV, or HIV. The patient agrees to be tested for HBV and HCV but refuses to be tested for HIV.
The nurse’s rapid HIV test is negative, his HBV and HCV test are negative, and his HBSAb titer is ≥ 10 mlU/ml. The patient’s HBV and HCV tests are negative.
The ED physician summarizes the situation for the nurse.
He is fully immunized against HBV, so there is no need for further testing or treatment.
Because the source is negative for HCV and does not have risk factors for the disease, no further testing is needed. If the nurse develops signs and symptoms of hepatitis, he should seek medical attention.
This was a percutaneous injury from a hollow needle that was visibly stained with blood; those are risk factors for the transmission of HIV. However, the injury was shallow, it did not enter a large vein, and it is unlikely - but not impossible - that the source is infected with HIV. The nurse is young, and there are no contraindications to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV for him. PEP for HIV is most effective when given within hours of exposure. If determined that the source is HIV-negative, PEP can be stopped.
There are no universally accepted guidelines for the use of HIV PEP in situations like this; the decision to use PEP is made on a case-by-case basis, considering the type of injury, the factors of the exposure that are for and against transmission, and the patient’s personal preference. The patient decides to be treated.
New York State Requirements for Adherence to Infection Control Standards
Healthcare professionals should adhere to scientifically accepted standards for infection control to prevent disease transmission between patients and healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals are also responsible for monitoring the infection control practices of subordinates.
Healthcare professionals practicing in New York state must complete an infection control education program during their professional training and every four years after that (NY State Department of Health, September 2019).
A recently passed public health law stipulates that on or before July 1, 2018, “ every physician, physician assistant and specialist assistant practicing in the state shall, on or before July first, nineteen hundred ninety-four and every four years after that, complete course work or training, appropriate to the professional's practice, approved by the department regarding infection control, which shall include sepsis, and barrier precautions, including engineering and work practice controls, following regulatory standards promulgated by the department in consultation with the department of education, to prevent the transmission of HIV, HBV, HCV and sepsis in the course of professional practice. Such coursework or training must also be completed by every medical student, medical resident, and physician assistant student in the state as part of the orientation programs conducted by medical schools, medical residency programs, and physician assistant programs” (NY State Department of Health, September 2019). In October 2017, legislation was passed requiring the inclusion of sepsis awareness and education into the training curriculum (NY State Department of Health, September 2019).
Section 239 of the New York State Public Health Law - Course Work or Training in Infection Control Practices, informally called the Infection Control and Barrier Precaution law, applies to these professions:
- Physician assistants
- Specialist assistants
- Dental hygienists
- Registered professional nurses
- Licensed practical nurses
- Medical students
- Medical residents
- Physician assistant students
Evidence of completion of the training must be submitted to the State Department of Health or the State Education Department. Physicians, registered physician assistants, and specialist assistants “hired by or granted professional privileges at a hospital or healthcare facility must document to that organization the completion of the approved course work at the time of hiring or when professional privileges are granted or renewed” (NY State Department of Health and State Education Department, 2018a). Healthcare professionals can be exempt from taking an infection control course in certain circumstances. Examples include an infectious disease specialist who has received equivalent training, healthcare professionals who are not actively practicing in New York, and anyone who does not provide direct patient care or oversee individuals or programs where others are responsible for providing patient care or reprocessing patient care equipment (NY State Department of Health, September 2019).
“All licensed healthcare facilities are responsible for monitoring and enforcing the proper use of infection control practices and Standard Precautions. Failure to comply can result in citations, potential fines, and other disciplinary action against the facility. Licensed healthcare professionals who fail to use appropriate infection control techniques may be charged with professional misconduct and disciplinary action.
Patient or employee complaints about lax infection control practices in private offices will cause an investigation by the Department of Health or Education. Substantiated lapses may result in charges of professional misconduct against licensed healthcare professionals who were directly involved, aware of the violations, or responsible for ensuring staff education and compliance” (NY State Education Department, 2011).
Healthcare professionals in New York state must understand and use these infection control techniques (NY State Education Department, 2011):
- Wear appropriate protective gloves when touching blood, saliva, other body fluids or secretions, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, soiled items, contaminated surfaces, sterile body areas, and instrument cleaning decontamination procedures.
- Discard used gloves following patient interactions and change to new gloves if they are torn or damaged during the treatment of a patient. Wash hands and don new gloves before performing services for another patient. Wash hands and other skin surfaces immediately if the hands are contaminated with blood or other body fluids.
Gloves should never be reused.
- Wear appropriate masks, gowns or aprons, and protective eyewear or chin-length plastic face shields whenever splashing or spattering of blood or other body fluids is likely to occur.
- Sterilize equipment and devices that enter the patient’s vascular system or other normally sterile body areas.
- Sterilize equipment and devices that touch intact mucous membranes but do not penetrate the patient’s body or use high-level disinfection for equipment and devices which cannot be sterilized before use for a patient.
- Use appropriate agents, including but not limited to detergents, for cleaning all equipment and devices before sterilization or disinfection.
- Cleaning, by use of appropriate agents, including but not limited to detergents, equipment, and devices that do not touch the patient or that only touch the patient's intact skin.
- Maintain equipment and devices used for sterilization according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
- Adequately monitoring the performance of all licensed or unlicensed personnel for whom the licensee is responsible regarding infection control techniques.
- Place used syringes, needles, scalpel blades, and other sharp instruments in appropriate puncture-resistant containers for disposal. Place reusable needles, scalpel blades, and other sharp instruments in appropriate puncture-resistant containers until they can be appropriately cleaned and sterilized.
- Provide and maintain appropriate ventilation devices to minimize the need for emergency mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.
- Refrain from direct patient care and handling patient care equipment when the healthcare professional has exudative lesions or weeping dermatitis. The condition has not been medically evaluated and determined to be safe or capable of being safely protected against while providing direct patient care or handling patient care equipment.
- Placing all blood and body fluid specimens in well-constructed containers with secure lids prevents leaking. Clean any spill of blood or other bodily fluids with an appropriate detergent and chemical germicide.
Transmission of Infectious Pathogens
The transmission of infectious pathogens impacts patient safety and increases the global burden of disease.
- A pathogen is a disease-producing microorganism.
- Transmission is any mechanism by which a source or reservoir spreads a pathogen to a host.
- A reservoir is any person, animal, plant, soil, substance, or any combination of these in which an infectious agent lives and multiplies. The infectious agent depends on the reservoir for survival, and the reservoir provides a place where the pathogen can reproduce itself so it can be transmitted to a susceptible host.
- Susceptibility is a host's inability to resist infection from a specific pathogen.
- The common vehicle is a contaminated material, product, or substance that is an intermediate means by which an infectious agent is transported to two or more susceptible hosts.
- Colonization: An organism is present in a host, multiplying, but there is no host interference or interaction with the host.
- Host: An organism in which another organism can live and potentially multiply.
- Infection: Invasion and multiplication by a microorganism. An infection may be local or systemic, begin as local and become systemic, and there may be no apparent host response or clinical signs and symptoms caused by the infection or the host response.
The incubation period is the time between the beginning of an infection and the onset of signs and symptoms.
- Latent period: The time between infection and the onset of signs and symptoms in one case of the disease.
A chain of events and circumstances is required for infection to occur. These include:
A reservoir for the pathogenic organism
A means to exit the reservoir
A mode of transmission
A susceptible host, and
A mode of entry into the host.
Pathogenic organisms include bacteria, rickettsia, viruses, protozoa, fungi, or parasites. The characteristics of microorganisms that can cause infection and disease are:
- Pathogenicity: The ability of a microorganism to cause disease.
Virulence: The degree of pathogenicity of a microorganism, i.e., how easily it can invade a host and the severity of the disease it can cause.
- Invasiveness: The ability of a microorganism to enter and move through tissue.
- Infectious dose: The number of microorganisms needed to initiate an infection.
- Organism specificity: Host preference of the infectious agent.
- Antigenic variation: The ability of an infectious organism to change its surface proteins to escape host defenses.
- Toxigenicity: The capacity to produce toxins.
- Resistance: A microorganism’s ability to develop resistance to antimicrobial agents.
The organism and its reservoir are the sources of infection. The organism must have the means to exit the reservoir. In an infected host, organisms exit through the respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, sexual transmission, or drainage from a wound. A transmission route is necessary to connect the source of infection to its new host.
Direct contact: Person-to-person contact. It can be skin-to-skin contact, sexual contact, and/or contact with infected body fluids like blood, respiratory secretions, or other infected body fluids.
Indirect contact: Usually contact with a harmless inanimate object. The infected inanimate object is called a fomite. Fomites can survive on objects and surfaces for a long time and be a potential source of infection for weeks and months, e.g., fomites containing norovirus and Clostridium difficile (C. difficile).
Droplet contact: It is a form of direct and indirect contact transmission. Large respiratory droplets carrying pathogens are expelled from the respiratory tract by coughing, sneezing, or talking. Droplets move through the air, but because of their size and the limited time they are airborne, they do not travel far and quickly settle on environmental surfaces. Contact with the contaminated surface, e.g., hand contact, and then contact of the hand to a mucous membrane spreads the pathogen from the surface to a host, meaning that
Droplet contact is how the influenza virus is spread. Droplet contact and transmission can also occur if someone is very close to an infected person who is coughing and/or sneezing, and the infected droplets inoculate mucous membranes of the eyes, nose, and/or mouth.
- Droplet nuclei: Residue of evaporated droplets that remain suspended in the air. Pathogens spread by airborne transmission include (but are not limited to) Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Varicella. Airborne transmission differs from the transmission of respiratory droplets in two ways:
Airborne infectious particles stay in the air longer than infected respiratory droplets, and
Airborne infectious particles travel much further than infected respiratory droplets.
- Dust: Particles in the air containing infectious agents.
The following table outlines the organism, mode of transmission, and incubation period for the most common microorganisms and parasites.
Table 1: Infectious Diseases
|Organism||Mode of Transmission||Incubation Period|
|Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)||Human immunodeficiency virus||
||Median of 10 years (Fauci et al., 2022)|
||2-4 weeks, occasionally longer (CDC, 2021h)|
||1-2 weeks (Lautensch-lager & Brockmeyer, 2019)|
||10-21 days (CDC, 2021b)|
||A few hours-5 days (CDC, 2022a)|
|Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease||Prion protein||
||16 months to 30 years (Jankovska et al., 2021)|
||C. gatti, 2 weeks to 3 years. (CDC, 2020a)
C. neoformans, unknown
||2-10 days, an average of 7 days (CDC, 2019d)|
For newborns, the onset is often delayed for months or years (CDC, 2020c; Karamch-andani et al., 2022; Tissera et al., 2022)
|Diarrheal diseases||Campylobacter species||
||2 to 5 days CDC, 2021a)|
||Variable, it may be up to 12 weeks after exposure to antibiotics (Curry, 2017)|
||6 hours to 6 days (CDC, 2022o)|
||1-2 days (CDC, 2020j)|
||4-7 days (CDC, 2019j)|
||1-3 weeks (CDC, 2021i)|
||1-14 days (CDC, 2022c)|
|Hand, foot, and mouth disease||Enterovirus genes||
||Not known, estimates vary widely (Koh et al., 2016, CDC, 2021d)|
|Foodborne hepatitis||Hepatitis A
||A: 2-6 weeks (CDC, 2020e)
E: 2-6 weeks (CDC, 2020e)
|Bloodborne hepatitis||Hepatitis B
||Hepatitis B: 60 to 150 days, average 90 days (CDC, 2022e)
Hepatitis C: 2 to 26 weeks, average is 2 to 12 weeks (CDC, 2020d)
Hepatitis D: Unclear
||5-7 days (Corsino et al., 2022)|
|Herpes simplex||Human herpes viruses 1 and 2||
||Average 4 days, range 2-14 days (CDC, 2021c)|
||3-17 days (CDC, 2021f)|
||21-35 days (Brunet et al., 2015)|
|Impetigo||Staphylococcus aureus (most common), Strepto-coccus pyogenes||
||10 days (CDC, 2022g)|
|Influenza||Influenza virus A, B, or C||
||1- 4 days (Budd et al., 2017)|
|Legionnaires’ disease||Legionella pneumophila||
||Commonly 5-6 days, range 2-14 days, occasionally longer (CDC, 2021f)|
||Usually within 2 weeks of ingesting con-taminated food (CDC, 2022j). Median gestational age for fetal listeriosis has been reported to be 31 weeks (Ke et al., 2022)|
|Lyme disease||Borrelia burgdorferi
||3-30 days (CDC, 2020f)|
|Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV)||Chlamydia trachomatis||
||1-2 weeks (Ciccarese et al., 2021)|
||7-30 days (CDC, 2022k)|
||11-12 days (Gastanaduy et al., 2019)|
|Meningococcal disease: meningitis and septicemia||Neisseria meningitidis||
||1-10 days, usually 3-4 days (Mbaeyi et al., 2021)|
|Mononucleosis||Epstein Barr virus||
||4-6 weeks (Cohen, 2014)|
|Mycobacterial diseases (non-tuberculosis) Mycobacterium species||Mycobacterium avium
pulmonary tract infections
||1-4 weeks, shorter and longer incubation periods can occur (CDC, 2018a)|
|Crab louse||Pthirus pubis||
||2-3 weeks (CDC, 2013)|
||1-2 months (CDC, 2013)|
|Pneumocystis pneumonia||Pneumocystis jirovecii||
||4-8 weeks (Miller et al., 2013)|
|Pneumococcal pneumonia||Streptococcus pneumoniae||
||1-3 days (CDC, 2022n)|
||Weeks to months (CDC, 2021m)|
|Respiratory syncytial disease||Respiratory syncytial virus||
||4-6 days average, range of 2 to 8 (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2021)|
|Rocky Mountain Spotted fever||Rickettsia rickettsii||
||3-12 days (CDC, 2019f)|
||2 days (CDC, 2021n)|
||Average of 17 days, the range is 12-23 days (CDC, 2020i)|
||1-4 days if there was a previous exposure, and 4-6 weeks for a first-time exposure (CDC, 2010)|
|Streptococci||Streptococcus group A with about 80 serologically distinct types||
||Variable, e.g., 2-5 days for group A strep pharyngitis (CDC, 2022d)|
||The average duration is 21 days. The range is 10-90 days (CDC, 2022p)|
||The average duration is 10 days but ranges from 3-21 days (CDC, 2020k). Neonatal tetanus averages 4 days but ranges from 4-14 days (CDC, 2020k)|
|Trichinellosis (Trichinosis)||Trichinella: Many species||
||1-2 days (CDC, 2020g)|
||3-8 weeks, 10 weeks for an immune response. A variable amount of weeks to years for symptoms to occur (Gardam & Hota, 2017)|
|Typhoid fever||Salmonella typhi||
||6-30 days (CDC, 2021p)|
The host must be susceptible to the infection for infection to occur. Factors influencing susceptibility include, but are not limited to:
- Number of organisms to which the host is exposed and the duration of exposure
- Age, the genetic constitution of the host, and general physical, mental, and emotional health and nutritional status of the host
- Status of hematopoietic systems; efficacy of the reticuloendothelial system
- Absent or abnormal immunoglobulins
- The number of T lymphocytes and their ability to function
Pregnant healthcare professionals are not known to be at greater risk of contracting bloodborne infections; however, infectious pathogens can be transmitted to the fetus.
The organism must have a portal of entry into the host for infection to occur. Portals of entry are the mucous membranes, non-intact skin, respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tracts, or a mechanism of introduction, such as a percutaneous injury or invasive device.
Microorganisms that can cause disease can develop resistance to antibiotics and other drugs used to treat infections caused by these pathogens. Antibiotic-resistant organisms have become an increasingly serious problem. Some of the more common ones are discussed.
Enterobacteriaceae are gram-negative bacilli that are commonly found in the gastrointestinal tract. Common species of this family that cause infections include Enterobacter, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are resistant to the carbapenem family of antibiotics (doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem). These antibiotics are traditionally used to treat pathogens resistant to broad-spectrum antimicrobials (CDC, 2019c). CRE is spread through contact with infected surfaces, e.g., hands or contaminated medical equipment. Infections with CRE are particularly dangerous: they can spread rapidly, and the mortality rate in hospitalized patients can exceed 50% (CDC, 2019c). CRE infections usually do not occur in healthy people; they are more likely in hospitalized patients with compromised immune systems, mechanically ventilated patients, or those who have received multiple antibiotics. The incidence of CRE infections is increasing. Control and prevention of CRE infections should focus on the following:
Identifying colonized patients
Screening by taking stool, rectal, and perirectal cultures, and wound cultures when appropriate
Strict adherence to handwashing protocol
Patient and staff cohorting
Using contact precautions (CDC, 2019c)
Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is transmitted primarily via the hands of healthcare professionals and by direct contact with contaminated equipment and surfaces. Transmission is very efficient, and S. aureus easily colonizes the skin and nares. Once colonized, the person faces the likelihood of infection when invasive procedures are performed.
MRSA colonization is quite common, so every patient must be assumed to have been exposed to or colonized with MRSA/ORSA. In addition, MRSA often contaminates medical equipment such as stethoscopes and environmental surfaces (Bhatta et al., 2022).
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends strict adherence to Standard and Contact Precautions, personal protective equipment (PPE), and appropriate handling of medical devices and laundry if MRSA is of special clinical or epidemiological significance (CDC, 2016b).
Vancomycin is the first-line drug for treating MRSA infections (Cong et al., 2019), but vancomycin-resistant S. aureus has developed. The susceptibility of S. aureus strains to vancomycin is determined by a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test. The MIC measures the minimum amount of antimicrobial agent that inhibits bacterial growth in a test tube. Staph bacteria are classified as vancomycin susceptible (VSSA), vancomycin-intermediate (VISA), and vancomycin-resistant (VRSA) (Cong et al., 2019).
These infections must be reported to the CDC and the state health department. The following is guidance for patients infected with VISA or VRSA:
- They should be in a single room
- Contact Precautions and Standard Precautions are required
- Staff education is recommended
- Minimize the number of staff caring for the patient
- Flag the chart to alert staff of the situation (CDC, 2015b)
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE)
Enterococci are gram-positive bacteria. They are a normal part of the gastrointestinal and female genital tract flora (CDC, 2019i). It is a relatively weak pathogen but can produce significant infections if the patient is infected with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE). Treatment options for these infections are limited. People at risk for (VRE) infections include:
- Patients previously treated with vancomycin
- Patients in intensive care
- Patients who are immunocompromised
- Post-operative patients
- Patients with in-dwelling IV or urinary catheters (CDC, 2019i)
(VRE) is transmitted primarily via the hands of healthcare professionals and by direct contact with contaminated equipment and surfaces. Many approaches have been used to control (VRE) in healthcare settings. The methods used should be tailored to the clinical setting, the specific patient/patients involved, and the epidemiological characteristics of the situation. Contact Precautions and Standard Precautions should be used to prevent transmission of (VRE) (CDC, 2019i).
Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (XDR-TB)
The Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria cause tuberculosis (TB), one of the oldest recognized infectious diseases. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is resistant to isoniazid and some second-line drugs. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) is resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, and fluoroquinolones. XDR-TB is also resistant to at least one of three injectable second-line drugs, such as amikacin, kanamycin, or capreomycin (CDC, 2016a).
Infection control measures should include separating the infected patient/patients, environmental controls, using Standard Precautions, Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette, Airborne Precautions, and staff use of particulate respirators (CDC, 2020l; CDC, 2019h).
Drug-Resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae
Penicillin-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains of this pathogen have emerged and are widespread in some communities (Ryan, 2022). A vaccine for the most common serotypes of S. pneumoniae is available, but vaccination rates are not optimal (Lu et al., 2021). Contact Precautions, Droplet Precautions, and Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette should be used when caring for patients infected with this pathogen.
Nosocomial drug-resistant A. baumannii infections cause bacteremia, pneumonia, and UTIs (McKay et al., 2022). The morbidity and mortality rates associated with drug-resistant Acinetobacter infections are very high (Kim et al., 2022a), and outbreaks of these infections in healthcare facilities are difficult to control (Lashinsky et al., 2017).
Contact transmission is the primary way Acinetobacter spreads, so Contact Precautions and Standard Precautions, with particular attention to hand washing, are integral to controlling and preventing these infections. Because of the danger of these infections and the difficulty in containing outbreaks, patients who have an infection with drug-resistant Acinetobacter may need to be isolated, or their placement in the facility should be carefully considered.
Prevention of Exposure to Infectious Pathogens
Policies, protocols, and controls are incorporated into the healthcare work setting to avoid or reduce exposure to potentially infectious materials. Healthcare-associated transmission is the transmission of microorganisms that are likely to occur in a healthcare setting. It can be reduced using engineered controls, safe injection practices, and safe work practices. Engineering controls are equipment, devices, or instruments that remove or isolate a hazard. Safe injection practices are equipment that allows the optimal performance of injections for patients, healthcare providers, and others that reduce exposure to injury or infection (Siegel et al., 2007). Work practice controls change practices and procedures to reduce or eliminate risks.
Standard Precautions are strategies for protecting healthcare professionals, patients, and visitors from the transmission of pathogenic organisms. Standard Precautions also prevent patient-to-patient transmission and staff-to-patient transmission. Standard Precautions assume that all pre-existing patient infections cannot be identified. The primary underpinning of Standard Precautions is that all body fluids and secretions should be considered potentially infectious. Standard Precautions apply to nonintact skin and mucous membranes, blood, and all body fluids, secretions, and excretions, except sweat (in certain circumstances, sweat can be considered infectious). In some cases, such as with specific pathogens like HIV, a patient’s body fluids, like vomit, are only considered a risk for disease transmission if they contain visible blood. Additional precautions are based on highly transmissible or epidemiologically important pathogens.
Transmission-Based Precautions are the infection control techniques and procedures that are used “. . . for patients who are known or suspected to be infected or colonized with infectious agents, including certain epidemiologically important pathogens, which require additional control measures to prevent transmission effectively. Since the infecting agent is usually unknown at admission, Transmission-Based Precautions are used. Transmission-Based Precautions are used according to the symptoms and etiology. Precautions are then modified when the pathogen is identified, or an infectious cause is ruled out” (Siegel et al., 2007). Transmission Precautions are used in addition to Standard Precautions, and Standard Precautions are used in all patient care situations (Siegel et al., 2007).
Conditions/Diseases that may require neutropenic precautions:
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)
- Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- Immunosuppressive therapy
Immunization is one method to reduce the transmission of communicable diseases. The following are recommendations for immunization based on age and exposure risk. Specifics and schedules for high-risk populations and catch-up immunizations are available from the CDC. Immunization schedules for adults are available from the CDC.
These recommendations for the immunization of healthcare personnel are from the CDC (CDC, 2016b):
- Hepatitis B - A 3-dose series of Recombivax HB or Engerix-B (dose #1 now, 2nd dose in 1 month, and the 3rd dose approximately 5 months after the 2nd) or a 2-dose series of Heplisav-B, with the doses separated by at least 4 weeks. An anti-HBs serologic test should be done 1-2 months after the final dose.
Influenza – One dose of influenza vaccine every year.
- Meningococcal – Microbiologists routinely exposed to Neisseria meningitidis should get a meningococcal conjugate vaccine and serogroup B meningococcal vaccine.
- MMR – Those born in 1957 or later without the MMR vaccine and serologic evidence of immunity or prior vaccination will get 2 doses of MMR (1 dose now and the 2nd dose at least 28 days later). If you were born in 1957 or later and have not had the MMR vaccine, or if you don’t have a blood test that shows you are immune to rubella, only 1 dose of MMR is recommended. However, you may receive 2 doses because the rubella component is in the combination vaccine with measles and mumps. For those born before 1957, see the MMR ACIP vaccine recommendations.
- Poliomyelitis - Laboratory workers who handle specimens that might contain polioviruses should consider getting the polio vaccine, regardless of whether they were vaccinated during childhood. Healthcare workers who have close contact with patients who may have traveled to areas or countries with a high risk of polio should also consider getting the polio vaccine (CDC, 2018b).
- Tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis – Tdap once if never vaccinated, and a Td booster every 10 years.
Pregnant healthcare workers should get a dose of Tdap during each pregnancy.
- Varicella – Healthcare personnel with no evidence of immunity to varicella should be given 2 doses of the varicella vaccine 4 weeks apart.
Development and Maintenance of a Safe Environment
Although the environment is a reservoir for various microorganisms, it is rarely implicated in disease transmission except in the immunocompromised population. Applying infection-control strategies effectively prevents opportunistic, environmentally-related infections in immunocompromised populations (Wingard, 2022).
Definitions: (Rutala & Weber, 2019)
- Cleaning: Removal of visible soil (e.g., organic and inorganic material) from objects and surfaces is usually accomplished manually or mechanically using water with detergents or enzymatic products. Thorough cleaning is essential before high-level disinfection and sterilization because inorganic and organic materials that remain on the surfaces of instruments interfere with the effectiveness of these processes.
- Contamination: The presence of microorganisms on inanimate objects or substances.
Decontamination: Decontamination is the process of removing disease-producing microorganisms and rendering the object safe to discard, handle, or use.
- Disinfection: A process that eliminates many or all pathogenic microorganisms, except bacterial spores on inanimate objects.
- Sterilization: Processes that eliminate or destroy all forms of microbial life.
Infection control strategies include:
Policies and procedures for cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization
Engineering and environmental controls.
General engineering and environmental control principles will be discussed; more information will be provided as specific clinical situations are covered.
Staff Education: Basics
Basic education has been briefly discussed in previous sections of the module, and its application to other parts of the infection control process will be covered below. The CDC and OSHA recommend that the healthcare facility or employer inform the staff of potential risks for exposure to infectious materials. The facility should also provide them with the education and equipment they need to prevent contamination of medical equipment and the environment and protect themselves and patients against contamination and infections.
Cleaning, Disinfection, and Sterilization
Cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization are essential for infection control and maintaining a safe environment. These processes can be used singly or in combination. They are done using different tools and techniques, producing different results. In simple terms, sterilization is intended to kill all microorganisms, disinfection will kill/remove most microorganisms, and cleaning will physically remove surface contamination and debris.
- In general, reusable medical devices or patient-care equipment that typically enters sterile tissue, the vascular system, or through which blood flows are considered critical items and should be sterilized before each use. Sterilization means using a physical or chemical procedure to destroy all microbial life, including highly resistant bacterial endospores. The primary sterilizing agents used in hospitals are a) moist heat by steam autoclaving, b) ethylene oxide gas, and c) dry heat. However, various chemical germicides (sterilants) have been used to reprocess reusable heat-sensitive medical devices and appear effective when used appropriately, e.g., according to the manufacturer's instructions. These chemicals are rarely used for sterilization but appear effective for high-level disinfection of medical devices that contact mucous membranes during use (e.g., flexible fiberoptic endoscopes).
- Heat-stable, reusable medical devices that enter the bloodstream or usually sterile tissue should always be reprocessed using heat-based sterilization methods (e.g., steam autoclave or dry heat oven).
- Laparoscopic or arthroscopic telescopes (optic portions of the endoscopic set) should be subjected to a sterilization procedure before each use; if this is not feasible, they should receive high-level disinfection. Heat-stable accessories to the endoscopic set, like trocars and operative instruments, should be sterilized by heat-based methods (e.g., steam autoclave or dry heat oven).
- At a minimum, reusable devices or items that touch mucous membranes should receive high-level disinfection between patients. These devices include reusable, flexible endoscopes, endotracheal tubes, anesthesia breathing circuits, and respiratory therapy equipment.
- Medical devices that require sterilization or disinfection must be thoroughly cleaned to reduce organic material or bioburden before being exposed to the germicide. The germicide and the device manufacturer's instructions should be followed closely.
Except in rare and special instances, items that do not ordinarily touch the patient or touch only intact skin are not involved in disease transmission and generally do not necessitate disinfection between uses on different patients. These items include crutches, bed boards, blood pressure cuffs, and other medical accessories. Consequently, depending on the particular equipment or item, washing with a detergent or using a low-level disinfectant may be sufficient when decontamination is needed. If non-critical items are grossly soiled with blood or other body fluids, a higher level of disinfection is required (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
Cleaning removes visible and surface contamination from an object; that is its primary purpose, and cleaning can be completed mechanically or with cleaners. Cleaning can also help disinfect, but the two processes are different. Cleaning is not intended to kill bacteria or other microorganisms. Disinfection is destroying pathogenic organisms; disinfection cannot and does not eliminate all organisms.
The following information is from the CDC Guideline for Sterilization and Disinfection in Healthcare facilities (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
- Remove visible organic residue (e.g., residue of blood and tissue) and inorganic salts with cleaning. Use cleaning agents that are capable of removing visible organic and inorganic residues.
- Clean medical devices as soon as practical after use (e.g., at the point of use) because soiled materials become dried onto the instruments. The instrument's dried or baked materials make removal more difficult and the disinfection or sterilization process less effective or ineffective.
- Perform manual cleaning (i.e., friction) or mechanical cleaning (e.g., ultrasonic cleaners, washer-disinfector, washer-sterilizers).
- If using an automatic washer/disinfector, ensure that the unit is used following the manufacturer’s recommendations.
- Detergents or enzymatic cleaners should be compatible with the metals and other materials used in medical instruments.
- Ensure that the rinse step is adequate for removing cleaning residues to levels that will not interfere with subsequent disinfection/sterilization processes.
- Discard or repair equipment that no longer functions as intended or cannot be properly cleaned, disinfected, or sterilized.
- The rinse step should be adequate for removing cleaning residues to levels that will not interfere with subsequent disinfection/sterilization processes.
- Inspect equipment surfaces for breaks in integrity that would interfere with cleaning or disinfection/sterilization.
- Meticulously clean patient-care items with water and detergent or water and enzymatic cleaners before high-level disinfection or sterilization procedures.
Cleaning and Disinfecting Environmental Surfaces in Healthcare Facilities
- Cleaning and disinfecting environmental surfaces and patient rooms have been shown to decrease the incidence of hospital-acquired infections and to reduce environmental contamination with potentially dangerous microorganisms such as C. difficile, MRSA, and VRE (Rutala & Weber, 2016).
- Clean housekeeping surfaces (e.g., floors, tabletops) regularly when spills occur and when these surfaces are visibly soiled.
- Disinfect or clean environmental surfaces regularly (e.g., daily, three times per week) and when surfaces are visibly soiled.
- Follow manufacturers’ instructions for proper disinfecting with detergent products, such as recommended use-dilution, material compatibility, storage, shelf-life, and safe use and disposal.
- Clean walls, blinds, and window curtains in patient-care areas when these surfaces are visibly contaminated or soiled.
- Prepare disinfecting or detergent solutions as needed and replace these with fresh solutions frequently (e.g., replace floor mopping solution every three patient rooms, and change no less often than at 60-minute intervals or according to the facility’s policy).
- Decontaminate mop heads and clean cloths regularly to prevent contamination.
- Use a one-step process and an EPA-registered hospital disinfectant designed for housekeeping purposes in patient care areas where:
- uncertainty exists about the nature of the soil on the surfaces (e.g., blood or body fluid contamination versus routine dust or dirt), or
- uncertainty exists about the presence of multidrug-resistant organisms on such surfaces
- Detergent and water are adequate for cleaning surfaces in non-patient care areas.
- Do not use high-level disinfectants/liquid chemical sterilants to disinfect non-critical surfaces.
- Wet-dust horizontal surfaces regularly, e.g., three times per week, using clean cloths moistened with an EPA-registered hospital disinfectant or detergent. Use the disinfectant or detergent as per the manufacturer’s recommendations.
- According to the label’s safety precautions and use directions, disinfect non-critical surfaces with an EPA-registered hospital disinfectant. Most EPA-registered hospital disinfectants have a label contact time of 10 minutes. However, many scientific studies have demonstrated the efficacy of hospital disinfectants against pathogens with a contact time of at least 1 minute.
- The user must follow all applicable label instructions on EPA-registered products by law. Suppose the user selects exposure conditions that differ from those on the EPA-registered product label. In that case, the user assumes liability for any injuries resulting from off-label use and is potentially subject to enforcement action.
- Do not use disinfectants to clean infant bassinets and incubators while these items are occupied. If disinfectants are used for the terminal cleaning of infant bassinets and incubators, thoroughly rinse the surfaces of these items with water and dry them before they are reused.
- Promptly clean and decontaminate spills of blood and other potentially infectious materials. Discard blood-contaminated items in compliance with federal regulations.
- Implement the following procedures for site decontamination of blood spills or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM). Use protective gloves and other PPE when sharps are involved. Use forceps to pick up sharps and discard these items in a puncture-resistant container appropriate for this task.
- Areas contaminated with blood spills should be disinfected using an EPA-registered tuberculocidal agent or a registered germicide on the EPA's D and E list.
- Disinfect areas contaminated with blood spills using an EPA-registered tuberculocidal agent, a registered germicide on the EPA Lists D and E, i.e., products with specific label claims for HIV or HBV or freshly diluted hypochlorite solution.
- If sodium hypochlorite solutions are selected, use a 1:100 dilution (e.g., 1:100 dilution of a 5.25-6.15% sodium hypochlorite provides 525-615 ppm available chlorine) to decontaminate nonporous surfaces after a small spill (e.g., <10 mL) of either blood or OPIM.
- If a spill involves large amounts (e.g., >10 mL) of blood or OPIM, or involves a culture spill in the laboratory, use a 1:10 dilution for the first application of hypochlorite solution before cleaning to reduce the risk of infection during the cleaning process (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
- Follow the decontamination process with terminal disinfection, using a 1:100 dilution of sodium hypochlorite.
- If the spill contains large amounts of blood or body fluids, clean the visible matter with disposable absorbent material and discard the contaminated materials in appropriate, labeled containment.
- Use gloves and PPE that is appropriate for the task.
- In units with high rates of endemic C. difficile infection or an outbreak setting, use dilute solutions of 5.25%–6.15% sodium hypochlorite for routine environmental disinfection (Rutala & Weber, 2019). Currently, no products are EPA-registered specifically for inactivating C. difficile spores.
- Suppose chlorine solution is not prepared fresh daily. In that case, it can be stored at room temperature for up to 30 days in a capped, opaque plastic bottle with a 50% reduction in chlorine concentration after 30 days of storage (e.g., 1000 ppm chlorine [approximately a 1:50 dilution] at day 0 decreases to 500 ppm chlorine by day 30).
- An EPA-registered sodium hypochlorite product is preferred, but generic versions of sodium hypochlorite (e.g., household chlorine bleach) can be used (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
Indications for Sterilization, High-Level Disinfection, and Low-Level Disinfection
Sterilize critical medical and surgical devices and instruments that typically enter sterile tissue, the vascular system, or a sterile body fluid flow (e.g., blood) before using them on/for a patient (Rutala & Weber, 2019). Provide, at a minimum, high-level disinfection for semi-critical patient-care equipment (e.g., gastrointestinal endoscopes, endotracheal tubes, anesthesia breathing circuits, and respiratory therapy equipment) that touches either mucous membranes or nonintact skin (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
Perform low-level disinfection for non-critical patient-care surfaces (e.g., bedrails, over-the-bed table) and equipment (e.g., blood pressure cuff) that touch intact skin (Rutala & Weber, 2016).
Selection and Use of Low-Level Disinfectants for Non-critical Patient-Care Devices
Intact skin is an effective barrier against most microorganisms. Because non-critical patient care devices like a blood pressure cuff will only contact intact skin, these items do not need to be sterilized or extensively disinfected (Rutala, 2016). There is no documentation of infectious disease transmission from a non-critical patient care device/patient care equipment (Rutala, 2016). However, these devices and equipment can contaminate the hands of healthcare personnel and subsequently cause person-to-person contamination, so cleaning these items is important.
- Process non-critical patient-care devices using a disinfectant and concentration of germicide.
- Disinfect non-critical medical devices (e.g., blood pressure cuff) with an EPA-registered hospital disinfectant using the label’s safety precautions and directions. By law, all applicable label instructions on EPA-registered products must be followed.
- Non-critical patient-care devices are disinfected regularly, such as after use on each patient or once daily, and when visibly soiled.
- If dedicated, disposable devices are not available, disinfect non-critical patient-care equipment after using it on a patient on contact precautions before using it on another patient (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
Do not perform disinfectant fogging for routine purposes in patient-care areas.
The manufacturer should be contacted for questions about disinfectants. A source of information about low-level or intermediate-level disinfectants is the Antimicrobial Program Branch, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Selected EPA-Registered Disinfectants (EPA) (703) 308-6411, online link.
High-Level Disinfection of Endoscopes
Endoscopes are fragile, expensive, difficult to clean, much used, and susceptible to contamination (Rutala & Weber, 2019). There are millions of endoscopic procedures done each year, and iatrogenic infections caused by contamination of endoscopes are rare (Calderwood et al., 2018; Rutala & Weber, 2019). However, endoscopes have been linked to more infectious outbreaks than any other reusable medical device, and failure to properly clean and disinfect endoscopes is a primary reason these outbreaks happen (Rutala & Weber, 2019). In addition, studies have shown that even cleaned and processed endoscopes are often contaminated (Goyal et al., 2022).
The recommendations for the disinfection and sterilization of endoscopes listed below are from the CDC (Rutala & Weber, 2019). The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, multi- medical societies, and the Society of Gastroenterology has also published guidelines for cleaning endoscopes (Calderwood et al., 2018). Test each flexible endoscope for leaks as part of each reprocessing cycle to detect damaged endoscopes. Remove any instrument that fails the leak test from clinical use and repair this instrument.
- Clean: Mechanically clean internal and external surfaces, including brushing internal channels and flushing each internal channel with water and a detergent or enzymatic cleaners (leak testing is recommended for endoscopes before immersion).
- Disinfect: Immerse the endoscope in high-level disinfectant (or chemical sterilant) and perfuse (eliminates air pockets and ensures contact of the germicide with the internal channels) disinfectant into all accessible channels, such as the suction/biopsy channel and air/water channel for the recommended time.
- Rinse: Rinse the endoscope and all channels with sterile water, filtered water (commonly used with AERs), or tap water (i.e., high-quality potable water that meets federal clean water standards at the point of use).
- Dry: Rinse the insertion tube and inner channels with alcohol, and dry with forced air after disinfection and before storage.
- Store: Store the endoscope to prevent recontamination and promote drying (e.g., hung vertically).
Store endoscopes in a manner that will protect them from damage or contamination.
- Sterilize or high-level disinfect the water bottle used to provide intraprocedural flush solution and its connecting tube at least once daily. After sterilizing or high-level disinfection of the water bottle, fill it with sterile water.
- Maintain a log for each procedure in which an endoscope has been used and record the following: patient’s name and medical record number, the type of procedure and the date, the name of the endoscopic, the system used to reprocess the endoscope (if more than one system could be used in the reprocessing area), and the serial number or other identifiers of the endoscope that was used.
- Design facilities where endoscopes are used and disinfected to provide a safe environment for healthcare professionals and patients. Use air-exchange equipment (e.g., the ventilation system, out-exhaust ducts) to minimize exposure of all persons to potentially toxic vapors (e.g., glutaraldehyde vapor). Do not exceed the allowable limits of the vapor concentration of the chemical sterilant or high-level disinfectant; these limits are set by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) and OSHA.
- Routinely test the liquid sterilant/high-level disinfectant to ensure minimal effective concentration of the active ingredient. Check the solution daily using the appropriate chemical indicator (e.g., glutaraldehyde chemical indicator to test minimal effective concentration of glutaraldehyde) and document the testing results. Discard the solution if the chemical indicator shows the concentration is less than the minimum effective concentration. Do not use the liquid sterilant/high-level disinfectant beyond the reuse life recommended by the manufacturer (e.g., 14 days for ortho-phthalaldehyde).
- Personnel assigned to reprocess endoscopes should be given device-specific reprocessing instructions to ensure proper cleaning and high-level disinfection or sterilization. Competency testing in these procedures should be done regularly.
- Educate all personnel who use disinfectants and sterilants about the possible biological, chemical, and environmental hazards of performing procedures that require these products.
- The appropriate PPE should be provided to the staff who clean and disinfect endoscopes.
- If using an automated endoscope reprocessor (AER), place the endoscope in the reprocessor, and attach all channel connectors to ensure exposure of all internal surfaces to the high-level disinfectant/chemical sterilant.
- If using an AER, ensure the endoscope can be effectively reprocessed in the AER. Also, ensure any required manual cleaning/disinfecting steps are performed (e.g., the elevator wire channel of a duodenoscope might not be adequately disinfected by most AERs).
- Review the FDA advisories and the scientific literature for reports of deficiencies that can lead to infection, as design flaws and improper operation and practices have compromised the effectiveness of AERs.
- Develop protocols to ensure that users can readily identify an endoscope that has been properly processed and is ready for patient use.
- Do not use the carrying case designed to transport clean and reprocessed endoscopes outside the healthcare environment.
- For quality assurance purposes, no recommendation is made about performing microbiologic testing of either endoscope or rinse water.
- If environmental microbiologic testing is conducted, use standard microbiologic techniques.
- If a cluster of endoscopy-related infections occurs, investigate potential transmission routes (e.g., person-to-person, common source) and reservoirs.
- Report outbreaks of endoscope-related infections to persons responsible for institutional infection control, risk management, and the FDA. Notify the local and state health departments, CDC, and manufacturer(s).
- According to this guideline, no recommendation is made regarding reprocessing an endoscope immediately before use if that endoscope has been processed after use.
- Compare the reprocessing instructions provided by the endoscope and the AER’s manufacturer’s instructions and resolve any conflicting recommendations.
Disinfection Strategies for Other Semi-Critical Devices
Other medical devices in contact with mucous membranes are considered to be semi-critical. They include but are not limited to, rectal and vaginal probes, flexible cystoscopes, tonometers, and ultrasound probes used for various procedures. The risk of contracting an infectious disease from one of these devices is minimal but not impossible Contamination with microorganisms such as cytomegalovirus, human papillomavirus, hepatitis C, herpes simplex, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas have been found on these devices, even after cleaning and disinfection (Leroy, 2013).
Disinfection strategies vary widely for these semi-critical items/devices. The FDA requests that manufacturers provide at least one validated cleaning and disinfection/sterilization protocol in labeling their devices. The CDC guidelines are listed below; disinfection and sterilization with different hydrogen peroxide or ultraviolet light are also being evaluated for sterilizing these devices.
- Even if probe covers have been used, clean and disinfect semi-critical devices such as rectal probes, vaginal probes, and cryosurgical probes with a product that is not toxic to staff, patients, probes, and retrieved germ cells (if applicable). A high-level disinfectant at the FDA-cleared exposure time should be used.
- Use a probe cover or a condom to reduce microbial contamination when available. Do not use a lower disinfection category or stop following appropriate disinfectant recommendations when using probe covers because these sheaths and condoms can fail.
- After high-level disinfection, rinse all items. Use sterile water, filtered water, or tap water followed by an alcohol rinse for semi-critical equipment that will have contact with mucous membranes of the upper respiratory tract, e.g., the nose, pharynx, and esophagus.
- There is no recommendation to use sterile or filtered water rather than tap water for rinsing semi-critical equipment that contacts the mucous membranes of the rectum (e.g., rectal probes, anoscope) or vagina (e.g., vaginal probes).
- Wipe clean tonometer tips and disinfect them by immersing them for 5-10 minutes in either 5000 ppm chlorine or 70% ethyl alcohol. None of these listed disinfectant products are FDA-cleared high-level disinfectants.
Methods of Sterilization
Steam is the preferred method for sterilizing critical medical and surgical instruments that are not damaged by heat, steam, pressure, or moisture.
- Cool steam or heat-sterilized items before they are handled or used in the operative setting.
- Follow the sterilization times, temperatures, and other operating parameters (e.g., gas concentration, humidity) recommended by the manufacturer(s) of the instruments, the sterilizer, and the container or wrap used that are consistent with government agency and professional organization guidelines.
- Use low-temperature sterilization technologies like ethylene oxide (EtO) or hydrogen peroxide gas plasma to reprocess critical patient-care equipment that is heat or moisture sensitive.
- Completely aerate surgical and medical items that have been sterilized in the EtO sterilizer before using these items.
- The peracetic acid immersion system can sterilize heat-sensitive immersible medical and surgical items.
- The peracetic acid immersion process must be sterilized, for critical items must be used immediately.
- Dry-heat sterilization at 340°F for 60 minutes can be used to sterilize items like powders and oils that can sustain high temperatures.
- Comply with the sterilizer manufacturer’s instructions regarding the sterilizer cycle parameters.
- Narrow-lumen devices are challenging to low-temperature sterilization technologies, and direct contact is necessary for sterilization to be effective. Ensure that the sterilant has direct contact with contaminated surfaces. For example, scopes processed in peracetic acid must be connected to channel irrigators (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
- Packaging materials must be compatible with the sterilization process and have received FDA 510[k] clearance.
- Packaging must be strong enough to resist punctures and tears and to provide a barrier to microorganisms and moisture (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
Monitoring of Sterilizers
- Chemical indicators indicate that the item has been exposed to the sterilization process. Chemical indicators should be used with biological indicators. Still, they should not replace them because only a biological indicator consisting of resistant spores can measure the microbial killing power of the sterilization process. Chemical indicators are placed outside each pack to show that the package has been processed through a sterilization cycle, but these indicators do not prove sterilization has been achieved. Preferably, a chemical indicator should also be placed on each pack's inside to verify sterilant penetration. Chemical indicators usually are either heat-or chemical-sensitive inks that change color when one or more sterilization parameters are present.
Biological indicators are the only process indicators that directly monitor the lethality of a given sterilization process. Biological indicators are recognized as the closest to an ideal monitor of the sterilization process because they measure the sterilization process directly by using the most resistant microorganisms (i.e., Bacillus spores) and not by merely testing the physical and chemical conditions necessary for sterilization.
- Use biologic indicators for every load containing implantable and quarantine items, whenever possible, until the biologic indicator is negative.
- Objects other than implantable objects do not need to be recalled because of a single positive spore test unless the steam sterilizer or the sterilization procedure is defective. A single positive spore test does not necessarily indicate a sterilizer failure. If the test is positive, the sterilizer should immediately be rechallenged for proper use and function. If there is a sterilizer malfunction, the items must be considered nonsterile, and the items from the suspect load(s) should be recalled, when possible, and reprocessed. Suppose the mechanical (e.g., time, temperature, pressure in the steam sterilizer) and chemical (internal and/or external) indicators suggest that the sterilizer was functioning properly. In that case, a single positive spore test probably does not indicate sterilizer malfunction, but the spore test should be repeated immediately. If the spore tests remain positive, the sterilizer should be discontinued until it is serviced. If patient-care items were used before retrieval, the infection control professional should assess the risk of infection in collaboration with central processing, surgical services, and risk management staff.
- The margin of safety in steam sterilization is sufficiently large enough that there is minimal infection risk associated with items in a load that show spore growth, especially if the item was properly cleaned and the temperature was achieved. No published studies document disease transmission via a non-retrieved surgical instrument following a sterilization cycle with a positive biological indicator.
- Sterilization records (mechanical, chemical, and biological) should comply with standards (e.g., Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Facilities requests 3 years) and state and federal regulations (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
- Place items correctly and loosely into the sterilizer's basket, shelf, tray, or cart. It will ensure that the penetration of the sterilant is not impeded (Rutala & Weber, 2016).
Storage of Sterile Items
- The sterile storage area should be well-ventilated and protect against dust, moisture, insects, and extreme temperature and humidity.
- Store sterile items, so the packaging is not compromised, e.g., punctured or bent.
- The shelf life of a packaged sterile item depends on many variables: the quality of the wrapper, the storage conditions, the conditions during transport, the amount of handling, and moisture. If event-related storage of sterile items is used, then packaged sterile items can be used indefinitely unless the packaging is compromised.
- Before they are used, evaluate packages for loss of integrity, e.g., tears, punctures, and/or wetness.
- If the integrity of the packaging is compromised, repack and reprocess the pack before use.
- If time-related storage of sterile items is used, label the pack at the time of sterilization with an expiration date. When the date expires, reprocess the pack (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
- Provide comprehensive training for all staff assigned to reprocess semi-critical and critical medical/surgical instruments.
- Compare the reprocessing instructions (e.g., for the appropriate use of endoscope connectors, the capping/non-capping of specific lumens) provided by the instrument and sterilizer manufacturer, and resolve any conflicting recommendations by communicating with both manufacturers.
- Conduct periodic infection control in high-risk reprocessing areas like the gastroenterology clinic and central processing to ensure that reprocessing instructions are current, accurate, and correctly implemented. Document all deviations from policy.
- The quality control program for sterilized items should include the following: a sterilizer maintenance contract with records of service, a system of process monitoring, air-removal testing for pre-vacuum steam sterilizers, visual inspection of packaging materials, and traceability of load contents.
- Record the type of sterilizer and cycle used, the load identification number and contents, the exposure parameters (e.g., time and temperature), the operator’s name or initials, and the mechanical, chemical, and biological monitoring results.
- Retain sterilization records for a time that complies with standards, statute limitations, and state and federal regulations.
- Periodically review sterilization policies and procedures.
- Preventive maintenance on sterilizers should be done by qualified personnel, and the manufacturer’s instructions should guide it (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
Flash sterilization is acceptable for processing cleaned patient-care items that cannot be packaged, sterilized, and stored before use. It is also used when there is insufficient time to sterilize an item using the preferred package method. Still, flash sterilization should not be used for convenience, as an alternative to purchasing additional instrument sets, or to save time. Because of the potential for serious infections, flash sterilization is not recommended for implantable devices (i.e., devices placed into a surgically or naturally formed human body cavity). However, flash sterilization may be unavoidable for some devices like orthopedic screws and plates. Suppose flash sterilization of an implantable device is unavoidable. In that case, recordkeeping (i.e., load identification, patient’s name/hospital identifier, and biological indicator result) is essential for epidemiological tracking (e.g., of surgical site infection, tracing results of biological indicators to patients who received the item to document sterility), and to assess the reliability of the sterilization process.
The time and temperature used for flash sterilization vary, depending on the type of sterilizer and the type of item, i.e., porous vs. non-porous items. Example: A non-porous item like a metal instrument with no lumens would be flash sterilized at 132°C/270°F for 3 minutes.
Steam sterilization – sterilization by moist heat under pressure - is the most widely used and dependable form. Moist heat destroys microorganisms through the irreversible coagulation and denaturation of enzymes and structural proteins. The process is nontoxic, inexpensive, rapidly microbicidal, sporicidal, and rapidly heats and penetrates fabrics (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
The basic principle of steam sterilization in an autoclave is to expose each item to direct steam contact at the required temperature and pressure for the specified time; the four parameters of steam sterilization are steam, pressure, temperature, and time. The two common steam-sterilizing temperatures are 121°C (250°F) and 132°C (270°F). These temperatures (and other high temperatures) must be maintained for the minimal time to kill microorganisms. Recognized minimum exposure periods for sterilization of wrapped healthcare supplies are 30 minutes at 121°C (250°F) in a gravity displacement sterilizer or 4 minutes at 132°C (270°C) in a pre-vacuum sterilizer.
Steam sterilization should be used whenever possible on all critical and semi-critical items that are heat and moisture-resistant, even when it is not essential for preventing pathogen transmission. Steam sterilizers also are used in healthcare facilities to decontaminate microbiological waste and sharps containers.
The Joint Commission (TJC) has recommendations for the immediate use of steam sterilization (IUSS).
- Review the equipment manufacturer’s instructions to determine if IUSS is appropriate for a device or instrument.
- Circumstances in which IUSS is an appropriate technique are:
- When a specific instrument is needed for an emergency procedure
- When a non-replaceable instrument has been contaminated but needs to be used immediately
- When an item is dropped on the floor but is needed immediately
- Using IUSS does not mean that the proper cleaning and transport steps can be omitted.
- Items suitable for IUSS must be processed in approved/validated containers suitable for IUSS.
- IUSS should not be used for convenience or due to limited instruments or equipment needed for the number of cases/procedures performed.
- Evaluate the IUSS process in all locations where it is being performed (TJC, 2017).
Reuse of Single-Use Medical Devices
The FDA considers hospitals or third-party reprocessors to be manufacturers and regulated similarly. Therefore, a reused single-use device will have to comply with the same regulatory requirements of the device when it was originally manufactured (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
are designed to remove soil and contaminants by cleaning and inactivating microorganisms by disinfection or sterilization. Reprocessing reusable devices should follow this three-step process (FDA, 2015).
Point-of-Use Processing: Reprocessing begins with processing at the point of use (i.e., proximity to the point of use of the device). It involves prompt, initial cleaning steps and/or measures to prevent the drying of soil and contaminants in and on the device.
Thorough Cleaning: The device should be thoroughly cleaned after the point of-use processing. Generally, thorough cleaning is done in a dedicated cleaning area. Devices that will likely not become contaminated with pathogens during use may not require disinfection and may be suitable for use only after cleaning.
Disinfection or Sterilization: Depending on the device's intended use, the device should be disinfected or sterilized and routed back into use.
Microbial Contamination of Disinfectants
Disinfectants used in healthcare facilities can be contaminated with disease-causing microorganisms, and hospital-acquired infections caused by contaminated disinfectants have been documented (Häfliger et al., 2020). These measures should be used to reduce the occurrence of contaminated disinfectants (Rutala & Weber, 2019):
- Prepare the disinfectant correctly. Some should not be diluted, and those that can be/should be diluted should be prepared using the manufacturer’s instructions.
- Prevent extrinsic contamination of germicides, e.g., container contamination, contaminated water used to dilute the product, or surface contamination of the healthcare environment where the germicides are prepared or used.
- The instructions on the disinfectant labels in terms of shelf life, storage, dilution, proper use, disposal, and material compatibility must be followed.
- The user is responsible for any harm caused by off-label use.
Disinfection in Ambulatory Care, Home Care, and the Home
The home environment should be as safe as hospitals or ambulatory care. Epidemics should not be a problem, and cross-infection should be rare. Healthcare providers are responsible for providing family members with information about home infection-control procedures, including hand hygiene, proper cleaning and disinfecting equipment, and safe storage of cleaned and disinfected devices.
- The products recommended for home disinfection of reusable objects are bleach, alcohol, and hydrogen peroxide.
The Associations for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) recommends that reusable objects (e.g., tracheostomy tubes) that touch mucous membranes be disinfected by immersion in 70% isopropyl alcohol for 5 minutes or 3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 minutes. Also, a 1:50 dilution of 5.25%–6.15% sodium hypochlorite (household bleach) for 5 minutes should be effective.
- Non-critical items like blood pressure cuffs and crutches can be cleaned with a detergent. Blood spills should be handled according to OSHA regulations. Sterilizing critical items is not generally practical in homes but could be accomplished by chemical sterilants or boiling.
- Single-use disposable items can be used, or reusable items can be sterilized in a hospital.
- Environmentally safe products have been recommended as alternatives to commercial germicides in the home-care setting. These alternatives, like ammonia, baking soda, vinegar, borate-based products, and liquid detergents, are not registered with the EPA as disinfectants or germicides and should not be used for disinfecting because they are ineffective against S. aureus. Borate-based products, baking soda, and detergents also are ineffective against Salmonella typhi and E. coli. However, undiluted vinegar and ammonia work effectively against Salmonella typhi and E. coli. Common commercial disinfectants designed for home use also are effective against certain antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
- Public concerns have been raised that using antimicrobials in the home can promote the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The issue is unresolved and needs further consideration through scientific and clinical investigations.
- The public health benefits of using disinfectants in the home are unknown. However, hypochlorites markedly reduce bacteria, and good hand and food hygiene standards can help reduce infections in the home. Also, laboratory studies indicate that many commercially prepared household disinfectants are effective against common pathogens and can interrupt surface-to-human transmission of pathogens (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
Engineering and Environmental Controls
Construction activities in or near healthcare facilities increase disease risks for airborne and waterborne diseases.
The purpose of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems in healthcare facilities is to:
- maintain the indoor air temperature and humidity at comfortable levels;
- control odors;
- remove contaminated air;
- facilitate air-handling requirements to protect from airborne, healthcare-related pathogens;
- direct airflow;
- manage outside air;
- provide reliable filtration, and
- minimize the risk of transmission of airborne pathogens (Sehulster & Chinn, 2003).
Decreased performance of healthcare facility HVAC systems, filter inefficiencies, improper installation, and poor maintenance can contribute to the spread of healthcare-related airborne infections. The CDC has further recommendations for HVAC systems in healthcare facilities that should be reviewed (Sehulster & Chinn, 2003).
Management of Equipment and Surfaces in Dentistry
Dentists and dental office personnel are exposed to blood, body fluids, and aerosols, and the exposure can be by direct contact, indirect contact, or inhalation. Transmission of infectious agents from staff to patient or patient to staff is rare in dental settings, but it has occurred (CDC, 2016c).
Infection control in dental settings is identical to infection control in other healthcare settings, and the basic principles outlined here should be observed (Rutala & Weber, 2019).
Administrative measures: A written infection control and infection prevention policy must be in place, there should be at least one person responsible for coordinating/overseeing the policy, and there should be a plan for handling exposures.
Infection control and infection prevention training: Training/education in infection control and infection prevention must be completed during the hiring period. It should also be performed annually, when employees are learning or performing new procedures, and according to local, state, and federal regulations.
Dental personnel safety: This would include (but is not limited to) proper immunizations, OSHA-approved training in the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standards, knowing the proper post-exposure protocol, and rules/policies for dental personnel and patients who have a potentially infectious illness. There are specific recommendations regarding the influenza virus (Sebastiani et al., 2017):
- Encourage all dental personnel to get seasonal influenza and 2009 H1N1 vaccinations (CDC, 2016b; Sebastiani et al., 2017).
- If a patient has an influenza-like illness, schedule non-urgent visits until the illness resolves and the patient is afebrile.
- Evaluate patients for the presence of influenza-like illness at check-in time and provide a face mask and tissues if needed.
- Use Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette for symptomatic patients and reschedule non-urgent care. Separate ill patients whenever possible.
- Urgent dental treatment can be done without an airborne infection isolation room as the transmission of 2009 H1N1 influenza is not thought to occur over longer distances, e.g., from one patient care area to another.
- If it is known or suspected that the patient has an influenza-like illness, use a treatment room with a closed door. If this is not possible, place the (potentially) infectious patient as far as possible from other patients (CDC, 2022b).
- Wear recommended PPE before entering the treatment room.
- Dental personnel should wear an N95 respirator before entering the room and providing treatment if a patient has suspected or confirmed 2009 H1N1 influenza.
- Minimize the potential for sprays and splatters.
- Program evaluation: A policy must evaluate infection control and prevention programs.
- Hand hygiene: Training in hand hygiene must be provided, and hand hygiene supplies must be available.
- PPE: Training on the proper use of PPE should be provided, and PPE supplies must be available.
- Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette: Training in Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette must be provided, and supplies needed to observe this infection control technique must be available.
Sterilization and disinfection: Policies and procedures for sterilization and disinfection must be in place and easily accessed, dental staff must be trained in these policies and procedures, and the appropriate equipment necessary for sterilization and disinfection must be available. Dental equipment, like medical equipment, should be divided into critical, semi-critical, and non-critical, and these classifications should be used as a guideline for choosing sterilization and disinfection techniques. Specific recommendations for dental setting sterilization and disinfection include the following (CDC, 2016c):
- A trained person should do cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization in the required reprocessing steps; this ensures that reprocessing results in a device that can be safely used for patient care. Training should also include the appropriate use of PPE to handle contaminated equipment safely.
- Patient-care items (e.g., dental instruments, devices, and equipment) are categorized as critical, semi-critical, or non-critical, depending on the potential risk for infection associated with their intended use.
- Critical items, such as surgical instruments and periodontal scalers, are those used to penetrate soft tissue or bone. They have the greatest risk of transmitting infection and should always be sterilized using heat.
- Semi-critical items (e.g., mouth mirrors, amalgam condensers, reusable dental impression trays) contact mucous membranes or non-intact skin (e.g., exposed skin that is chapped, abraded, or has dermatitis). These items have a lower risk of transmission. Because most semi-critical items in dentistry are heat-tolerant, they should also be sterilized using heat. If a semi-critical item is heat-sensitive, it should be replaced with a heat-tolerant or disposable alternative. If none are available, it should, at a minimum, be processed using high-level disinfection.
- Dental handpieces and associated attachments, including low-speed motors and reusable prophylaxis angles, should be heat sterilized between patients, not high-level or surface disinfected. Although these devices are considered semi-critical, their internal surfaces can become contaminated with patient materials. If they are not properly cleaned and heat sterilized, other patients may be exposed to potentially infectious materials.
- Digital radiography sensors are also considered semi-critical and should be protected with an FDA-cleared barrier to reduce contamination during use, followed by cleaning and heat-sterilization or high-level disinfection between patients. If the item cannot tolerate these procedures, then, at a minimum, protect it with an FDA-cleared barrier. In addition, clean and disinfect with an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered hospital disinfectant with intermediate-level activity between patients. Because these items vary by manufacturer and their ability to be sterilized or high-level disinfected also varies, refer to manufacturer instructions for reprocessing.
- Non-critical patient-care items (e.g., radiograph head/cone, blood pressure cuff) only contact intact skin. These items pose the least risk of transmission of infection. In most cases, cleaning, or if visibly soiled, cleaning followed by disinfection with an EPA-registered hospital disinfectant is adequate. Protecting these surfaces with disposable barriers might be a preferred alternative. Non-critical surfaces might frequently be touched with gloved hands during patient care or become contaminated with blood or other potentially infectious material. These surfaces can subsequently contact instruments, hands, gloves, or devices and could be a source of caregiver-object-patient pathogen transmission. These surfaces should be disinfected between patient contacts with an intermediate disinfectant or a low-level disinfectant. Barrier protection can also be used on these surfaces, and the coverings can be changed between patients.
Cleaning to remove debris and organic contamination from instruments should always occur before disinfection or sterilization. If blood, saliva, and other contamination are not removed, these materials can shield microorganisms and potentially compromise the disinfection or sterilization process. Automated cleaning equipment (e.g., ultrasonic cleaner, washer-disinfector) should remove debris, improve cleaning effectiveness, and decrease worker exposure to blood. After cleaning, dried instruments should be inspected, wrapped, packaged, or placed into container systems before heat sterilization. Packages should be labeled to show the sterilizer used, the cycle or load number, the date of sterilization, and, if applicable, the expiration date. Information like this can help retrieve processed items if an instrument processing/sterilization fails.
The ability of a sterilizer to reach the conditions necessary to achieve sterilization should be monitored using a combination of biological, mechanical, and chemical indicators. Biological indicators, or spore tests, are the most accepted method for monitoring the sterilization process because they assess the sterilization process directly by killing known highly resistant microorganisms (e.g., Geobacillus or Bacillus species). A spore test should be used at least weekly to monitor sterilizers. However, mechanical and chemical monitoring should also be performed because spore tests are only performed periodically (e.g., once a week, once a day), and the results are usually not obtained immediately.
Sterile instruments and supplies should be stored in covered or closed cabinets. Wrapped packages of sterilized instruments should be inspected before opening and use to ensure the packaging material has not been compromised (e.g., wet, torn, punctured) during storage. The contents of any compromised packs should be reprocessed (i.e., cleaned, packaged, and heat-sterilized again) before use on a patient.
Sterilization monitoring (e.g., biological, mechanical, chemical monitoring) and equipment maintenance records are important components of a dental infection prevention program. Maintaining accurate records ensures cycle parameters have been met and establishes accountability. In addition, if there is a problem with a sterilizer (e.g., unchanged chemical indicator, positive spore test), documentation helps to determine if an instrument recall is necessary.
Medical waste, including tissues, extracted teeth, dental amalgams, and other materials, should be considered infectious and handled and disposed of properly.
Environmental infection control and prevention (CDC, 2016c): Surfaces that are likely to be contaminated and that patients or staff may have contact with should be regularly cleaned or cleaned using the proper disinfectant. Ordinary surfaces (e.g., walls) can be cleaned with soap and water; high-level disinfectants are not recommended for these surfaces as they can be corrosive and damaging. Spills of contaminated/potentially contaminated material should be correctly and promptly cleaned, and PPE should be used during the cleanup.
Emphasis on cleaning and disinfection should be placed on surfaces most likely to become contaminated with pathogens, including clinical contact surfaces (e.g., frequently touched surfaces such as light handles, bracket trays, switches on dental units, and computer equipment) in the patient-care area. When these surfaces are touched, microorganisms can be transferred to other surfaces, such as instruments.
Clinical contact surfaces should be barrier protected or cleaned and disinfected between patients. EPA-registered hospital disinfectants or detergents/disinfectants labeled for use in health care settings should be used for disinfection. Disinfectant products should not be used as cleaners unless the label indicates the product is suitable for such use. Follow manufacturer recommendations for cleaning and disinfection (e.g., amount, dilution, contact time, safe use, and disposal). Facility policies and procedures should also address prompt and appropriate cleaning and decontamination of spills of blood or other potentially infectious materials. Surfaces like floors, walls, and sinks carry less risk of disease transmission than clinical contact surfaces, and they can be cleaned with soap and water or cleaned and disinfected if visibly contaminated with blood.
Dental unit water quality: Water lines used for dental procedures can develop biofilm and growth of bacteria (CDC, 2021k). Most of the microorganisms typically found in dental unit waterlines have limited pathogenic potential, but Legionella species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and non-tuberculous Mycobacterium have been found in these water systems. Dental units must have a water filtration system that allows for ≤ 500 colony-forming units (CFU) per mL of heterotrophic water bacteria (CDC, 2021k). (Note: A heterotrophic organism requires carbon and nitrogen for its metabolic activity).
Key recommendations for maintaining dental water quality are (CDC, 2021k):
- Use water that meets EPA regulatory standards for drinking water (i.e., ≤ 500 CFU/mL of heterotrophic water bacteria) for routine dental treatment output water.
- Consult with the dental unit manufacturer for appropriate methods and equipment to maintain the quality of dental water.
- Follow recommendations for monitoring water quality provided by the manufacturer of the unit or waterline treatment product.
- Use sterile saline or water as a coolant/irrigant when performing surgical procedures. Use an appropriate delivery device like a sterile bulb syringe, sterile tubing that bypasses dental unit water lines, or a single-use sterile device.
Selected Issues in Infection Control and Prevention: Diseases/Conditions
Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are common nosocomial infections. HAP is the most common nosocomial infection (Klompas et al., 2022a) and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality (Ko et al., 2021; Modi & Kovacs, 2020). HAP is defined as new pneumonia that begins > 48 hours after admission in non-intubated patients (Modi & Kovacs, 2020). VAP is defined as new pneumonia that begins > 48 hours after endotracheal intubation (Modi & Kovacs, 2020).
- Chest surgery or abdominal surgery
- Chronic lung disease, e.g., asthma, COPD
- Chronic renal failure
- CNS depression
- Drugs that increase gastric pH
- Frequent ventilator circuit changes
- ICU admission
- Intracranial pressure monitoring
- Extensive trauma
- Muscle relaxers
- Opioid use
- Tube feeding
- Older age (> 70)
Measures that may help prevent aspiration are listed below (Klompas, 2021; Neill & Dean, 2019; AACCN, 2016).
- Maintain head-of-bed elevation
- Avoid intubation if possible
Minimize the use of sedatives
- Oral hygiene
- Proper patient positioning during feeding
- Maintain and improve the patient’s physical condition
- Maintaining the ventilator circuit
- Minimize secretion pooling that is above the endotracheal tube cuff
- Combining core preventive measures into a care bundle
Primary Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Legionnaires Disease
Legionella is a bacterium that causes the pulmonary infection of Legionnaire’s disease (CDC, 2021g).
Legionellosis outbreaks in workplaces are commonly caused by Legionella growth in poorly maintained artificial water systems (CDC, n.d.). Examples of sources of Legionella-contaminated water systems that can cause Legionnaire’s disease are listed below (CDC, 2021g; OSHA, n.d.).
- Cooling towers, evaporative condensers, and fluid coolers using evaporation to remove heat
- Potable water systems and domestic hot water systems
- Humidifiers, misters, foggers, and decorative or display fountains can create a water spray
- Spas, whirlpools, and hot tubs
- Cooling misters, produce misters, and evaporative coolers
- Industrial processes creating aerosolized water
- A Legionellosis outbreak also can occur when aerosolized Legionella is disseminated throughout a workplace in an air handling system from an external or internal contaminated source
Standard Precautions are sufficient infection control techniques when caring for a patient with Legionnaires’ disease (Siegel et al., 2007).
Healthy people do not have a high risk of developing Legionnaire’s disease, and the infection rate after exposure is <5% (CDC, 2021g; OSHA, n.d.). However, Legionnaire’s disease can be quite severe, and the fatality rate has been reported to be 10% and 25% if the disease is contracted in a hospital (CDC, 2021g). Factors that increase the risk of developing Legionnaires’ disease include (CDC, 2021g):
- Age ≥ 50 years
- Chronic lung disease
- Chronic illnesses such as diabetes, hepatic failure, or renal failure
- Cigarette smoking (current or past)
- A compromised immune system caused by a disease or a medication
- Exposure to hot tubs
- Heavy drinking
- Systemic malignancy
- Travel outside the home (staying in hotels)
- Recent care at a healthcare facility
- The patient has failed outpatient antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia.
- The patient has severe pneumonia, particularly if they require intensive care.
- The patient is immunocompromised and has pneumonia.
The patient has pneumonia, and they have traveled away from home for an overnight stay (contaminated water supplies often cause Legionella outbreaks in apartment buildings, hotels, and hospitals). Legionnaires’ disease was first identified and named when an outbreak occurred in a hotel in Philadelphia in 1976; the hotel’s air condition system was contaminated with Legionella.
- The patient has pneumonia, and there is a Legionnaires’ disease outbreak.
- The patient is at risk for Legionnaires’ disease with healthcare-associated pneumonia (pneumonia with onset > 48 hours after admission).
- The patient had an overnight stay in a hospital within 14 days of the onset of symptoms.
- There is an epidemiological link to a setting in which there is a confirmed case of Legionella or in which there has been at least one laboratory-confirmed case of Legionnaire’s disease.
- Other patients in the healthcare facility have, in the past 12 months, been diagnosed with Legionnaires’ disease.
- There is a positive environmental test for Legionella.
- There are changes in water quality that may lead to Legionella growth.
Clinical laboratory testing: Periodically review the availability and clinicians’ use of laboratory diagnostic tests for Legionnaires’ disease. If clinicians do not routinely use the tests on patients diagnosed with or suspected of pneumonia, implement measures to enhance clinicians’ use of the tests.
Water Management for the Prevention of Legionella Contamination:
A water management program identifies conditions that may cause Legionella contamination and intervenes to minimize the growth and spread of Legionella and other waterborne pathogens in building water systems (CDC, 2021g). Seven key activities should be performed in a Legionella water management program (CDC, 2021g):
- Establish a water management program team.
- Describe the building’s water systems using flow diagrams and a written description.
- Identify areas where Legionella could grow and spread.
- Decide where control measures should be applied and how to monitor them.
- Establish ways to intervene when control limits are not met.
- Ensure the program runs as designed (verification) and is effective (validation).
- Document and communicate all the activities.
An effective water management system should (CDC, 2021g):
- Maintain water temperatures outside the ideal range for Legionella growth (77–113°F).
- Prevent water stagnation.
- Ensure adequate disinfection.
- Maintain plumbing, equipment, and fixtures to prevent sediment, scale, corrosion, and biofilm, providing habitat and nutrients for Legionella.
Routine water sampling to detect Legionella may be appropriate (CDC, 2021g). “The water management program team should regularly monitor water quality parameters, such as disinfectant and temperature levels. By monitoring these parameters, the team can ensure that building water systems are operating to minimize hazardous conditions that could encourage Legionella and other waterborne pathogens to grow. However, it is up to the team to determine how to validate the program's efficacy, based on the environmental assessment and data supporting the overall performance of the water management program” (CDC, 2021h).
Transplant units: In facilities with hematopoietic stem-cell- or solid-organ transplantation programs, periodic culturing for Legionellae in water samples from the transplant unit(s) can be performed as part of a comprehensive strategy to prevent Legionnaires’ disease in transplant recipients.
No recommendation can be made about the optimal methods (i.e., frequency, number of sites) for environmental surveillance cultures in transplant units.
Maintain a high index of suspicion for Legionellosis in transplant patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia even when environmental surveillance cultures do not yield Legionella.
If Legionella spp. is detected in the water of a transplant, remove faucet aerators in areas for severely immunocompromised patients.
Transplant units/positive cultures: If Legionella are detected in the potable water supply of a transplant unit, and until Legionella are no longer detected by culture:
- Decontaminate the water supply.
- Restrict severely immunocompromised patients from taking showers.
- Use water not contaminated with Legionella for patients’ sponge baths.
- Provide hematopoietic stem cell patients sterile water for tooth brushing, drinking, and flushing nasogastric tubes.
- Do not use water from faucets with Legionella-contaminated water in patients’ rooms to avoid creating infectious aerosols.
Healthcare facilities that do not house or treat severely immunocompromised patients (e.g., hematopoietic stem cell transplant or solid-organ transplant recipients):
- If a case of laboratory-confirmed health-care-associated Legionnaires’ disease is identified, or when two or more cases of laboratory-confirmed, possible health-care-associated Legionnaires' disease occur within 6 months of each other:
- Contact the local or state health department or the CDC if the disease is reportable in the state or if assistance is needed.
- Conduct an epidemiologic investigation by reviewing microbiologic, serologic, and postmortem data to identify previous cases.
- Begin intensive prospective surveillance for additional cases of healthcare-associated Legionnaire’s disease.
- If there is no evidence of continued nosocomial transmissions, continue the intensive prospective surveillance for cases for >2 months after the surveillance has begun.
- If evidence of continued transmission exists:
- Conduct an environmental investigation to determine the source(s) of Legionella by collecting water samples from potential sources of aerosolized water and saving, and subtyping isolates of Legionella obtained from patients and the environment.
- If a source is not identified, continue surveillance for new cases for >2 months. Depending on the scope of the outbreak, decide to either defer decontamination pending identification of the source(s) of Legionella or proceed with decontamination of the hospital's water distribution system, with particular attention to the specific hospital areas involved in the outbreak.
- If a source of infection is identified, promptly decontaminate the source.
Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Pertussis
Pertussis is caused by the Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis) bacterium. The B. pertussis bacterium is transmitted by the deposition of infected nasal, oral, or respiratory secretions on a host’s mucous membranes. The B. pertussis bacterium is highly contagious; secondary attack rates are > 80% in susceptible household contacts. People who are particularly vulnerable to becoming infected with B. pertussis and developing severe symptoms are:
Infants < 12 months of age,
women in the third trimester of pregnancy, and
people who have airway disease or who are immunocompromised (Kilgore et al., 2016).
Transmission in healthcare facilities happens when there is close, face-to-face unprotected (unmasked) contact with an infected person, e.g., an unmasked healthcare worker bathing or feeding a patient, administering a bronchodilator, or doing/assisting with intubation.
The incubation period of pertussis is typically 5 to 10 days, but symptoms may begin as late as 3 weeks after exposure.
Use Standard Precautions and Droplet Precautions when caring for someone who has or is suspected of having pertussis. Droplet precautions should be used for 5 days after the initiation of effective treatment; after that time, the patient is no longer contagious (Siegel et al., 2007). Preferably the patient should be in a single room, but cohorting is acceptable (Siegel et al., 2007). Single-patient rooms are preferred. Post-exposure chemoprophylaxis for household contacts and healthcare workers with prolonged exposure to respiratory secretions is recommended (Siegel et al., 2007).
The CDC recommendations for preventing the transmission of B. pertussis in healthcare facilities include:
- Rapid diagnosis and treatment
- Vaccinate healthcare workers
- Administer post-exposure prophylaxis to exposed persons
- Exclude potentially infectious healthcare workers from the facility
Diagnosis of pertussis is made based on clinical history and laboratory testing. Although cultures are considered the gold standard for diagnosing pertussis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) provides sensitive results more rapidly.
A healthcare worker vaccinated against pertussis may become infected and develop the disease. Post-exposure prophylaxis with azithromycin, clarithromycin, or erythromycin is recommended. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is an alternative (Kilgore et al., 2016).
For asymptomatic healthcare personnel, regardless of vaccination status, who have exposure to pertussis and are likely to interact with persons at increased risk for severe pertussis: if these people are not receiving postexposure prophylaxis, restrict from contact (e.g., furlough, duty restriction, or reassignment) with patients and other persons at increased risk for severe pertussis for 21 days after the last exposure.
For asymptomatic healthcare personnel, regardless of vaccination status, who are exposed: administer postexposure prophylaxis or implement daily monitoring for 21 days after the last exposure.
For asymptomatic healthcare personnel, regardless of vaccination status, with exposure to pertussis and who have preexisting health conditions that may be exacerbated by a pertussis infection: administer postexposure prophylaxis.
Symptomatic healthcare personnel with known or suspected pertussis should be excluded from working from 21 days from the onset of the cough or until 5 days after the start of effective antimicrobial therapy.
Asymptomatic healthcare personnel exposed to pertussis who receive postexposure prophylaxis do not need work restrictions (Kilgore et al., 2016).
Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis
Aspergillus is a fungus that is the cause of pulmonary aspergillosis. Aspergillus is ubiquitous in the environment and is transmitted to human hosts by inhalation of infected conidia (CDC, 2022h). Hospital-acquired cases have been reported, sometimes related to construction dust exposure and contaminated medical equipment. The incubation period for aspergillosis is unclear (CDC, 2022h).
Infection with Aspergillus can cause a localized pulmonary infection, especially in patients with pulmonary disease, and immunocompromised people can develop an invasive pulmonary infection. The infection can spread to other organs like the bones, brain, and skin (CDC, 2022h). People who are at risk for a severe, invasive Aspergillus infection include (but are not limited to) those who have:
- Acquired immunodeficiencies
- Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant
- Prolonged neutropenia
- Solid organ transplant (SOT)
- Inherited or acquired immunodeficiencies
- The use of corticosteroids (Patterson et al., 2016)
Aspergillosis is diagnosed by culturing and histopathologic/cytologic examination of fluid and tissue samples (Patterson et al., 2016). Treatment will depend on the patient’s co-morbidities and the type of infection, i.e., localized or invasive.
Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Adenovirus, Parainfluenza Virus, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections
Adenoviruses, parainfluenza virus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are common causes of infections like the common cold, conjunctivitis, gastroenteritis, and pneumonia (Clark et al., 2022; CDC, 2020k; CDC, 2019e; Crowe, 2022). Infections with these viruses can be mild and self-limiting. Still, they can also cause a serious illness, particularly in someone who is immunocompromised, in the elderly, the very young, or in people with certain diseases/medical conditions (Clark et al., 2022; CDC, 2020h; CDC, 2019e).
Adenovirus infections can be especially harmful to people with COPD, HIV, an immunocompromised immune system, and those who have had cardiac surgery or a stem cell transplant (Clark et al., 2022).
Older adults and people with compromised immune systems are susceptible to a severe parainfluenza virus infection (CDC, 2019e).
Infants, children, and adults with certain diseases/medical conditions or in certain age groups are more likely to develop a severe RSV infection and include (CDC, 2019e):
- Premature infants
- Infants < 6 months of age
- Children < 2 years of age who have chronic lung disease or congenital heart disease
- Children with suppressed immune systems
- Children who have neuromuscular disorders
- Children who have a neuromuscular disorder that causes difficulty swallowing or clearing of mucus secretions
- Adults > 65 years of age
- Adults who have chronic heart or lung disease
- Immunocompromised adults
Adenoviruses are transmitted by direct contact with a fomite or an infected person and by inoculation of mucous membranes by infected respiratory droplets (CDC, 2019b).
Human parainfluenza viruses are transmitted directly with infected droplets or when an infected person breathes, coughs, or sneezes, spreading infected droplets. The human parainfluenza viruses may remain infectious in airborne droplets for over an hour and on surfaces for a few hours, depending on environmental conditions (CDC, 2019e).
The respiratory syncytial virus is transmitted by infected secretions of the eyes and nose (CDC, 2020k).
Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Influenza
Influenza infections are very common, and every year in the United States, 5% to 20% of the population gets an influenza infection (CDC, 2021l). For most people, influenza infection is mild and self-limiting. Still, influenza can be very severe and occasionally fatal for the elderly, young people, or certain diseases/medical conditions (CDC, 2021j). From 2010 to 2020, there were 12,000 to 52,000 deaths from the flu every year.
Influenza is primarily transmitted by contact with large, infected respiratory droplets that are expelled when an infected person coughs or sneezes (CDC, 2021l). The droplets can inoculate mucous membranes after hand contact with an infected fomite (CDC, 2021l). Because the infected droplets do not remain airborne for long or travel a long distance (≤ 6 feet), direct inoculation requires very close contact with an infected person (CDC, 2021l).
Factors that increase the risk of serious complications for the flu include, but are not limited to (CDC, 2021j):
- Age < 2 years, > 65 years
- Diabetes mellitus
- Heart disease
- Kidney disease
- Liver disease
- Non-Hispanic Black persons, Hispanic or Latino persons, and American Indian or Alaska Native persons
- Pregnant women
The CDC’s recommendations for preventing the seasonal flu from occurring in patients and staff of healthcare facilities are discussed below. A healthcare facility is defined as including, but not limited to “. . . acute-care hospitals; long-term care facilities, such as nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities; physicians’ offices; urgent-care centers, outpatient clinics; and home healthcare” (CDC, 2021l). These recommendations are available online.
The administration of the healthcare facility should provide all healthcare workers with education and training on preventing the transmission of infectious diseases, specifically:
Signs and symptoms of influenza.
Risk factors for complications.
Diseases/medical conditions that increase the staff’s risk of contracting influenza.
When and to whom the staff should report their signs and symptoms of influenza.
Proper use of PPE and infection control precautions (handwashing, Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette).
Engineering controls that are used to prevent transmission and reduce exposure.
Promote the use of and administer seasonal influenza vaccine. Vaccination “. . . is the most important measure to prevent seasonal influenza infection” (CDC, 2021l).
Minimize potential exposures
Instruct patients and persons accompanying them to a healthcare facility to inform providers upon arrival if they have respiratory infection symptoms.
Reduce the number of elective visits by patients who have confirmed or suspected influenza, especially if the symptoms are mild and the patient is not at risk for complications. Consider online or telephone consultation.
Provide handwashing equipment/facilities, masks, and information on how and when to use these infection control measures. Consider setting up a triage/screening area.
Monitor and manage ill healthcare personnel
Healthcare workers who develop signs and symptoms of respiratory infection should not report to work. If they are at work, they should stop doing patient care, don a face mask, and notify the supervisor.
Healthcare workers should not work until at least 24 hours after they no longer have a fever without using an antipyretic. Anyone with ongoing respiratory symptoms should be evaluated by occupational health to determine the appropriateness of contact with patients. In addition, these staff members should be considered for temporary reassignment or exclusion from work for 7 days from the onset of symptoms or until the non-cough symptoms have resolved, whichever is longer.
A healthcare worker with acute respiratory signs and symptoms but who is afebrile may still have an influenza infection. That worker should be evaluated to determine the appropriateness of contact with patients.
A healthcare worker suspected of having influenza may benefit from antiviral treatment.
Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette, hand washing, and mask use should be reinforced and re-emphasized.
In most cases, decisions about work restrictions and assignments for personnel with respiratory illness should be guided by clinical signs and symptoms rather than by laboratory testing for influenza because laboratory testing may result in delays in diagnosis, false negative test results, or both.
Adhere to Standard Precautions Adhere to Droplet Precautions Suppose a patient is suspected of having influenza or it is confirmed that they have influenza. In that case, Droplet Precautions should be used for 7 days after illness onset or until 24 hours after the resolution of fever and respiratory symptoms, whichever is longer. In some cases, facilities may choose Droplet precautions for a longer period, based on clinical judgment, e.g., young children or severely immunocompromised patients, who may shed influenza virus for longer periods. Place patients with suspected or confirmed influenza in a private room or area. If this is not possible, consult an infection control specialist to determine if cohorting is appropriate. If Droplet Precautions are in place, the patient should wear a mask when transported outside the room. Anyone in close contact with the patient, like a radiology technician, should be informed of the situation beforehand.
Use caution when performing aerosol-generating procedures
An aerosol-generating procedure should only be done if it can’t be postponed.
Limit the number of staff present during the procedure. Influenza vaccination should be offered to the staff present during the procedure.
Wear an N95 mask or an equivalent, gown, gloves, goggles, and a facemask.
Do the procedure in an AIIR, if possible.
Manage visitor access to and movement within the facility
Screen visitors before they enter the facility.
Visitors should be limited to those necessary for the patient’s emotional well-being.
Visitors should use Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette, hand washing, PPE, and limit the number of surfaces they touch. The facility should provide visitors with instructions on these infection control techniques. Visitors should not be allowed to be present during aerosol-generating procedures.
Monitor influenza activity
Healthcare settings should promptly establish mechanisms and policies to alert about increased influenza activity in the community or if an outbreak occurs within the facility. Collecting clinical specimens for viral culture may help inform public health efforts.
Environmental infection Control
Standard cleaning and disinfection procedures are sufficient for influenza virus environmental control. Management of laundry, food service utensils, and medical waste should also be performed following standard procedures. These items are not a source of influenza virus transmission when these items are properly managed. Laundry and food service utensils should first be cleaned, then sanitized as appropriate. Some medical waste may be designated as regulated or biohazardous waste and require special handling and disposal methods.
Consider designing and installing engineering controls to reduce or eliminate exposures by shielding healthcare workers and other patients from infected individuals.
Administer antiviral treatment and chemoprophylaxis of patients and personnel when appropriate
Use the CDC’s recommendations on the CDC website for the most current recommendations on the use of antiviral agents for treatment and chemoprophylaxis.
Healthcare personnel at high risk for complications of influenza
Vaccination and early treatment with antiviral medications are for people with an increased risk for influenza complications. Staff with a high risk for influenza complications should consult with their provider if they develop signs and symptoms of influenza.
Occupational Exposure to Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and HIV
Healthcare personnel who perform patient care are at risk for exposure to potentially dangerous pathogens, and the most common of these are HBV, HCV, and HIV. Fortunately, the transmission of one of these highly virulent microorganisms from patient to provider and the development of infection is usually uncommon. However, occupational exposures to pathogens such as HBV, HCV, and HIV are a common everyday experience in healthcare facilities and during patient care. Nurses and other healthcare professionals must understand the risks of exposure and how to protect themselves.
- Prevalence of the infectious pathogen in the general population and the patient population.
- Frequency of exposures to these pathogens.
- Nature of the exposure and efficiency of transmission for that exposure: percutaneous, mucosal, non-intact skin, or intact skin, a deep puncture versus a splash exposure, the amount of blood involved, the bore of the needle if there was a needlestick injury.
- The viruses present in the contaminated fluid and the titer of the virus (i.e., the viral load) in that fluid. These are the two most important factors in determining the risk for transmission (Fauci et al., 2022; Weber, 2020).
- Availability and efficacy of pre-and post-exposure prophylaxis.
- The underlying health and immune system function of the exposed person.
Blood is the most important transmission source to healthcare professionals. Other body fluids, such as cerebrospinal fluid, synovial fluid, pericardial fluid, pleural fluid, peritoneal fluid, and amniotic fluid, are potentially infectious (Weber, 2020). Semen and vaginal secretions can be a source of sexual transmission of these viruses (Fauci et al., 2022). Other body fluids, e.g., feces, gastric secretions, nasal secretions, saliva, sputum, sweat, tears, and urine, may contain low amounts of HBV, HCV, and HIV. Unless these fluids are visibly contaminated with blood, they are not considered infectious (Fauci et al., 2022; Schillie et al., 2018; Weber et al., 2015).
Risk of Occupational Transmission/Infection of HBV, HCV, and HIV
HIV: The primary risk of HIV transmission in healthcare is exposure to contaminated blood, typically by a needlestick injury. The risk of HIV transmission after percutaneous exposure has been reported to be 0.23% (Shenoy & Weber, 2021). The risk of HIV transmission after mucosal exposure is estimated at 0.09% (Shenoy & Weber, 2021). The risk of HIV transmission after non-intact skin exposure is rare (Fauci et al., 2022) and has been estimated to be < 0.1% (Shenoy & Weber, 2021). Transmission of HIV through intact skin has not been documented (Fauci et al., 2022).
Fauci et al. (2022) wrote: “In the United States, a total of 58 documented cases of occupational HIV transmission to health care workers, and 150 possible transmissions have been reported by the CDC. Since 1999, only one confirmed case (a laboratory technician sustaining a needle puncture while working with a live HIV culture in 2008) has been reported.”
However, as with the risk estimations for HCV exposure, these estimates have been criticized as possibly being too high and based on conditions that do not reflect current exposure circumstances and the availability and effectiveness of post-exposure prophylaxis (Nwaiwu et al., 2017).
Fortunately, the risk of HCV and HIV transmission and infection is very low, and although HBV is highly infectious, hepatitis B vaccination prevents infection after exposure (Schillie et al., 2018).
Any actual, possible, or potential occupational exposure to HBV, HCV, or HIV should be reported to the appropriate in-house person or department (e.g., supervisor, employee health) immediately or as soon as possible. Do not decide that exposure is/is not a risk for HBV, HCV, or HIV transmission. The decision is the responsibility of the person/department that evaluates risks and prescribes treatment. In several investigations of nosocomial HBV outbreaks, most infected healthcare professionals could not recall an overt percutaneous injury. Although in some studies, up to one-third of the infected persons recalled caring for a hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patient. However, HBV and HCV can survive on environmental surfaces for many hours and days (Shenoy & Weber, 2021). Treatment of exposures should focus on wound care, evaluation of the risk, and post-exposure drug prophylaxis (Schillie et al., 2013):
- Wound care: The basics of wound care are the same for exposure to HBV, HCV, or HIV. Wash the wound with soap and water, and flush the eyes and mucous membranes with water. Antiseptics have virucidal action, which may be helpful (Shenoy & Weber, 2021). Do not squeeze a wound to express blood, and do not flush a wound with bleach (Shenoy & Weber, 2021).
- Hepatitis B: The source should be tested for HBsAg, HBsAb, and HBcAb (National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021). A healthcare worker who has confirmed HBV exposure and is not immune should be vaccinated and/or receive hepatitis immune globulin (Weber, 2020). The need for post-exposure testing and drug prophylaxis after exposure to HBV depends on the HBV status of the source patient and the immunization status of the healthcare professional and the source (Weber, 2020). There are a variety of possible circumstances.
- Example: The exposed healthcare worker has been fully vaccinated against HBV, and that person has a positive response to the vaccination, i.e., a post-vaccination HBSAb titer of ≥ 10 mlU/ml; no treatment or testing is needed. If the exposed person has been fully vaccinated but does not have a positive response, they should be given HBV immunoglobulin and revaccinated (National Clinicians Consultation Center, 2021).
- The treatment recommendations for all the possible situations regarding when and for whom post-exposure drug prophylaxis should be used after an HBV exposure will not be covered here; they are available at the National Clinicians Consultation Center Website and on the CDC Website.
- Hepatitis C: The source patient should be tested as soon as possible after the exposure, preferably within 48 hours (Moorman et al., 2020). The preferred option is to test for HCV RNA; the other option is to test for anti-HCV, and if that is positive, test for HCV RNA (Moorman et al., 2020).
The exposed person should have anti-HCV testing as soon as possible after the exposure, preferably within 48 hours (Moorman et al., 2020), and an HCV RNA test if the anti-HCV is positive. If the source is known or there is an increased risk for HCV acquisition, e.g., injection drug use within the previous 4 months, or if risk cannot be reliably assessed, initial testing of the source patient should include a nucleic acid test (NAT) for HCV RNA (Moorman et al., 2020).
- Treatment: Post-exposure prophylaxis with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in response to a confirmed exposure to HCV is not recommended. If the source is HCV RNA positive, if the source was anti-HCV positive but HCV RNA testing wasn’t done, or if the source’s HCV status cannot be determined, the exposed person should be tested for the presence of HCV RNA 3 to 6 weeks after the exposure. Four to 6 months after exposure, the exposed person should have an anti-HCV test and an HCV RNA test if the anti-HCV test is positive. After that, if the final tests are negative, no further testing is needed unless the exposed person is immunocompromised and/or has liver disease. In those cases, additional testing can be considered (Moorman et al., 2020). If the exposed person has signs/symptoms of an acute HCV infection at any time, they should be tested. If the source or the exposed person tests positive for HCV RNA, refer for evaluation and treatment (Moorman et al., 2020). There is no HCV vaccine.
- HIV: The source person should be tested if possible (Kuhar et al., 2013). Concerns about HIV-negative sources might be in the so-called window period before seroconversion (i.e., the period between initial HIV infection and the development of detectable HIV antibodies). No such instances of occupational transmission have been detected in the United States. Hence, investigating whether a source patient might be in the window period is unnecessary for determining whether HIV PEP is indicated unless acute retroviral syndrome is clinically suspected (Kuhar et al., 2013).
- The source should have a rapid test for HIV Ag/Ab or HIV Ab (Kuhar et al., 2013; National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021); the result of a rapid HIV antigen-antibody test is available within 30 minutes. The exposed person should have a rapid test for HIV Ag/Ab or HIV Ab, an HBV test, and an HCV Ab test (National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021). If the source’s HIV test is negative, PEP should be stopped, and no further treatment is needed (Kuhar et al., 2013); National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021).
If the source’s HIV test is positive, it should be assumed to be a true positive.
- Post-exposure prophylaxis is typically not warranted if the HIV status of the source is not known (National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021). The need for PEP should be decided on a case-by-case basis, the epidemiologic likelihood of transmission and risk factors, and the severity of the injury (Kuhar et al., 2013; National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021). In this situation, it is prudent to get a consultation, and PEP can be started while waiting for the consult (National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021).
- Administration of (PEP) should not be delayed while waiting for the test results (Kuhar et al., 2013; National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021).
The best time to start PEP is within hours of exposure, as the effectiveness of HIV PEP is time-sensitive (National Clinical Consultation center, 2021). HIV PEP can be administered > 72 hours after exposure, but that is considered the point after which its effectiveness is not known (Kuhar et al., 2013; National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021).
- Consult an infectious disease expert for advice on giving PEP if the exposed person is pregnant, breastfeeding, or is or could be resistant to antiretroviral therapy. An infectious disease consult should be obtained if there is/could be a drug-drug interaction between the PEP drugs and the exposed person’s medications (Kuhar et al., 2013).
- The preferred PEP is a three-drug regimen, and the treatment duration is 28 days (National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021).
- Truvada™ - a combination of tenofovir 300 mg plus emtricitabine 200 mg, one tablet a day, plus
- Raltegravir (Isentress®) 400 mg, one tablet twice a day, plus
- Dolutegravir (Tivicay™), 50 mg, one tablet once a day
- Other drug regimens can be used for special circumstances, e.g., for someone with significant renal impairment (Kuhar et al., 2013).
- There is no HIV vaccine.
- The source should have a rapid test for HIV Ag/Ab or HIV Ab (Kuhar et al., 2013; National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021); the result of a rapid HIV antigen-antibody test is available within 30 minutes. The exposed person should have a rapid test for HIV Ag/Ab or HIV Ab, an HBV test, and an HCV Ab test (National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021). If the source’s HIV test is negative, PEP should be stopped, and no further treatment is needed (Kuhar et al., 2013); National Clinician Consultation Center, 2021).
- By calling 1-888-448-4911 from anywhere in the United States from 9:00 am to 9:00 pm, seven days a week, clinicians can access the National Clinicians Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Hotline (PEPline). The PEPline has trained physicians to give clinicians information, counseling, and treatment recommendations for professionals with needlestick injuries and other serious occupational exposures to bloodborne microorganisms that lead to such serious infections or diseases as HIV or hepatitis.
Other helpful resources are:
- HIV Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry. Address: Research Park, 1011 Ashes Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405. Telephone: 800-258-4263; fax: 800-800-1052. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Medwatch, FDA (for reporting unusual or severe toxicity to antiretroviral agents) here. Address: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993. Telephone: 800-332-1088.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. AIDS Info. Address: AIDSinfo, P.O. Box 4780, Rockville, MD 20849-6303. Telephone: 1-800-4448-0440; fax, 1-302-315-2818; TTY, 1-888-480-3739. Email: ContactUs@aidsinfo.nih.gov
Monkeypox is a rare viral disease caused by the monkeypox virus. It is endemic in rainforests in Central and West Africa (Siegel et al., 2007), but there have recently been many (relatively so) cases reported in the United States.
Monkeypox is transmitted by direct contact with the monkeypox rash, scabs, or infected body fluids (CDC, 2022l). It can also be transmitted by respiratory secretions if someone has prolonged, face-to-face contact or during intimate physical contact, by touching contaminated items, and vertical transmission from mother to fetus. Airborne transmission does not appear to occur. And monkeypox can be spread from an infected animal to a human by bites, scratches, and eating the meat of an infected animal. It is unknown if monkeypox can be transmitted by semen or vaginal fluids (CDC, 2022l).
Monkeypox is not contagious during the incubation period; it is possibly contagious during the prodromal period and is contagious if a rash is present. When all the scabs have fallen off and new skin has formed, monkeypox is no longer contagious (CDC, 2022l).
Young children (<8 years of age), individuals who are pregnant or immunocompromised, and individuals with a history of atopic dermatitis or eczema may be at an increased risk for severe outcomes from monkeypox disease (CDC, 2022l).
Use Standard Precautions, Airborne Precautions (until monkeypox has been confirmed and smallpox has been ruled out), and Contact Precautions until the lesions have crusted over (Siegel et al., 2007).
A confirmed or suspected monkeypox patient should be in a single room; a special air-handling room is unnecessary (CDC, 2022l).
Staff who enter the room should wear a gown, gloves, N95, and eye protection (CDC, 2022l).
Transporting the patient outside the room should be done only if necessary and unavoidable, and the patient should wear a mask outside the room (CDC, 2022l). Any aerosol-generating procedures should be done in an AIIR.
Waste that has been contaminated with monkeypox should be handled like any other potentially infectious material. No specific cleaning/disinfection procedures are required. Dry dusting, sweeping, or vacuuming should be avoided; wet cleaning is preferred.
Visitors should be limited to persons essential to the patient's well-being (CDC, 2022l).
Exposure to Monkeypox
Healthcare personnel and patients in healthcare facilities exposed to monkeypox should be monitored and receive post-exposure management according to current recommendations (CDC, 2022m).
Healthcare workers: A healthcare worker who has cared for a monkeypox patient should be alert to the development of symptoms of monkeypox infection, especially within 21 days after the last date of care, and should notify infection control, occupational health, and the health department if symptoms occur.
Healthcare workers who have unprotected exposures (i.e., not wearing PPE) to patients with monkeypox do not need to be excluded from work duty. They should undergo active surveillance for symptoms, including temperature measurement at least twice daily for symptoms 21 days following the exposure. Before reporting for work each day, the healthcare worker should be interviewed regarding evidence of fever or rash.
Healthcare workers who have cared for or otherwise been in direct or indirect contact with monkeypox patients while adhering to recommended infection control precautions may undergo self-monitoring or active monitoring as determined by the health department.
Those in contact with animals or people confirmed to have monkeypox should be monitored for symptoms for 21 days. Symptoms include a fever ≥100.4°F (38°C), chills, new lymphadenopathy (periauricular, axillary, cervical, or inguinal), and a new skin rash.
Contacts should be instructed to monitor their temperature twice daily. If symptoms develop, contacts should immediately self-isolate and contact the health department for further guidance.
If fever or rash develops, contacts should immediately self-isolate and contact their local or state health department.
If only chills or lymphadenopathy develop, the contact should remain at their residence and self-isolate for 24 hours.
During this time, the individual should monitor their temperature for fever; if a fever or rash develops, the health department should be contacted immediately.
If fever or rash does not develop and chills or lymphadenopathy persist, a clinician should evaluate the contact for a potential cause. Clinicians can consult with their state health departments if monkeypox is suspected.
Contacts who remain asymptomatic can continue routine daily activities (e.g., going to work or school). Contacts should not donate blood, cells, tissue, breast milk, semen, or organs while under symptom surveillance.
Vaccines for monkeypox are available. Antiviral treatment can be used for patients with a high risk for severe disease.
Key points from the CDC’s Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic are summarized below. The full text of these recommendations is available online: use this link to access.
The CDC also recommends infection control and transmission prevention in dialysis clinics, dental offices, emergency medical services, long-term care facilities, intermediate care facilities for people with intellectual disabilities, and psychiatric residential facilities. Those recommendations can be viewed using this link.
Identify at-risk visitors: Visitors who could have or do have COVID-19, e.g., a positive COVID-19 test, close contact with someone who has COVID-19, or symptoms of the disease. Educate the public about the need to avoid visiting the facility if they have a positive COVID-19 test, have close contact with someone who has COVID-19, or has symptoms of the disease (CDC, 2022i).
Source control: Source control uses respirators or well-fitting facemasks or cloth masks to cover a person’s mouth and nose to prevent the spread of respiratory secretions when breathing, talking, sneezing, or coughing (CDC, 2022q).
Infection control precautions and patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Patients should be placed in a single room. There should be a dedicated bathroom, and movement outside the room should be limited.
Standard Precautions and Transmission-Based Precautions (Contact Precautions, Droplet Precautions, and Airborne Precautions, as needed) should be used.
Healthcare workers should wear an N95, eye protection, a gown, and gloves when they enter the room (CDC, 2022q).
Duration of Transmission-Based Precautions: Determining when Transmission-Based Precautions can be discontinued is based on the severity of the illness, the patient’s current condition, the time frame of the infection, and the patient’s immune status. Example: The patient had a mild to moderate illness, they are not immunocompromised, at least 10 days have passed since the onset of symptoms, and at least 24 hours have passed since the patient was last febrile (assuming no use of antipyretics, and the symptoms have improved), Transmission-Based Precautions can be discontinued. “Ultimately, clinical judgment and suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection determine whether to continue or discontinue empiric Transmission-Based Precautions.” The full text of the CDC’s recommendations for the duration of Transmission-Based Precautions can be viewed using this link.
Aerosol-generating procedures should be done, if necessary, in an AIIR. If possible, visitors should not be present; only essential healthcare workers should be present.
Visitation should be limited, and visitors should be instructed to minimize their time in other parts of the facility after being with someone with a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Universal use of PPE by healthcare workers.
A NIOSH-approved N95 mask or its equivalent.
The N95 should be worn once and discarded after each contact with a patient with a SARS-CoV-2 infection or if the patient is on Droplet Precautions.
An N95 should be worn during an aerosol-generating procedure.
An N95 should be worn when other risk factors for transmission are present, e.g., the patient is not up to date with COVID-19 vaccination.
An N95 may also be used if healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 transmission is identified and universal respirator use by healthcare workers in the affected area is not already in place.
Eye protection should be worn for all patient care encounters (CDC, 2022q).
Encourage social distancing (CDC, 2022q).
SARS-CoV-2 testing: This should be done following current guidelines (CDC, 2022q).
Create a Process to Respond to SARS-CoV-2 Exposures in Healthcare Workers and Others (CDC, 2022q).
Return to work after COVID-19 infection.
Healthcare workers who have a mild to moderate illness and who are not moderately to severely immunocompromised (CDC, 2022q):
At least 7 days if a negative antigen is obtained within 48 hours before returning to work (or 10 days if testing is not performed or if there is a positive test on day 5-7) have passed since symptoms first appeared, and
At least 24 hours have passed since the last fever without the use of fever-reducing medications, and
Symptoms (e.g., cough, shortness of breath) have improved.
Healthcare workers who were asymptomatic throughout their infection and who are not moderately to severely immunocompromised:
At least 7 days if a negative antigen is obtained within 48 hours before returning to work (or 10 days if testing is not performed or if there is a positive test on day 5-7) have passed since the date of their first positive viral test.
Healthcare workers who have a severe to critical illness and who are not moderately to severely immunocompromised:
At least 10 days and up to 20 days have passed since symptoms first appeared, and
At least 24 hours have passed since the last fever without the use of fever-reducing medications, and
Symptoms (e.g., cough, shortness of breath) have improved.
The test-based strategy, as described for moderately to severely immunocompromised providers below, can inform the duration of isolation.
The exact criteria for determining which healthcare professional will shed replication-competent virus for longer periods are unknown. Disease severity factors and immunocompromising conditions should be considered when determining the appropriate duration for specific healthcare professionals.
Healthcare workers who are moderate to severely immunocompromised may produce replication-competent virus beyond 20 days after symptom onset or, for those who were asymptomatic throughout their infection, the date of their first positive viral test.
Return to Work Criteria for healthcare professionals who were exposed to individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.
These criteria determine when a healthcare worker can return to work after exposure to someone who has a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (CDC, 2022q):
Definition of exposure: An exposure is being within 6 feet of someone with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or having direct contact with infectious excretions/secretions from someone with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. There is no precise definition of what prolonged contact is, but “. . . it is reasonable to consider the exposure of 15 minutes or more as prolonged. Exposure could refer to a single 15-minute exposure to one infected individual or several briefer exposures to one or more infected individuals adding up to at least 15 minutes for 24 hours.”
Place of exposure: Was the exposure in a well or poorly ventilated area?
PPE: Was the exposed person wearing PPE?
Vaccination status of the source and the exposed person.
- Environmental infection control
“Dedicated medical equipment should be used when caring for a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.
All non-dedicated, non-disposable medical equipment used for that patient should be cleaned and disinfected according to manufacturer’s instructions and facility policies before use on another patient.”
“Routine cleaning and disinfection procedures (e.g., using cleaners and water to pre-clean surfaces before applying an EPA-registered, hospital-grade disinfectant to frequently touched surfaces or objects for appropriate contact times (as indicated on the product’s label) are appropriate for SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare settings.”
Management of laundry, food service utensils, and medical waste should follow routine procedures.
Once the patient has been discharged or transferred, healthcare professionals, including environmental services personnel, should refrain from entering the vacated room until sufficient time has elapsed for enough air to remove potentially infectious particles. After this time has elapsed, the room should undergo appropriate cleaning and surface disinfection before it is returned to routine use (CDC, 2022q).
Sepsis Awareness and Education
Sepsis shall mean a proven or suspected infection accompanied by a systemic inflammatory response. Severe sepsis shall mean sepsis plus at least one sign of hypoperfusion or organ dysfunction. For pediatrics, severe sepsis shall mean one of the following: cardiovascular organ dysfunction or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), or two or more organ dysfunctions. Septic shock shall mean severe sepsis with persistent hypotension or cardiovascular organ dysfunction despite adequate intravenous fluid resuscitation. Septic shock in pediatrics means severe sepsis and cardiovascular dysfunction despite adequate intravenous fluid resuscitation.
The clinical view of sepsis has changed over time, and terms such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), early sepsis, severe sepsis, and septicemia are no longer included in the definition of sepsis.
The pathogenesis of sepsis is very complex, and a full discussion of the process will not be included here. In brief, sepsis begins with an infection and indicates the presence of a microorganism. The normal response to infection is to destroy or contain the microorganisms through the immune response, e.g., the activity of macrophages and the activation and production of inflammatory mediators that direct and control the immune response. In sepsis, however, the inflammatory response is exaggerated and generalized, and healthy tissue and organs, not only those of the initial location of the infection, become damaged and dysfunctional.
A bacterial infection typically causes sepsis. The populations at risk for sepsis include children < 1 year of age, people ≥ 65 years of age, people with chronic conditions like diabetes, lung disease, kidney disease, or cancer, and those with an impaired immune system. An infection often causes sepsis in the lungs, urinary tract, skin, and/or gastrointestinal tract. “Most sepsis cases are community-acquired. Seven in 10 patients with sepsis have recently used healthcare services or had chronic conditions requiring frequent medical care (New York State, 2018b).
Sepsis is a very serious public health problem. The WHO noted that in 2017 there were an estimated 48.9 million cases of sepsis and 11 million sepsis-related deaths worldwide, which accounted for almost 20% of all global deaths (WHO, 2020). The New York State Department of Health (2018a) estimates that severe sepsis and septic shock affect approximately 50,000 patients annually. The mortality rate of sepsis for the fourth quarter of 2018 was 23.5% (New York State Department of Health, 2019).
The New York State Sepsis Improvement Initiative, Rory’s Law, and the New York State Infection Control Training Requirements
The New York State Sepsis Improvement Initiative and Rory’s Law
In 2014, New York began to require every hospital in the state that provides care for sepsis patients to develop and implement evidence-based protocols. They are to provide the Department of Health with clinical information that could be used to evaluate the hospital’s performance and to determine the risk-adjusted mortality of patients treated for sepsis at each hospital. These requirements were initiated in response to the death of 12-year-old Rory Staunton. Staunton developed sepsis after suffering an abrasion, and despite being hospitalized, he died five days after the injury. The opinion is that Staunton’s case was mismanaged and that although he had clear clinical and laboratory indications of sepsis, the diagnosis was not made. His parents began a movement for public awareness of sepsis and change in in-hospital care of sepsis, eventually culminating in the passage of the informally known regulations as Rory’s Law.
Each hospital in New York that provides care for patients with sepsis must abide by and follow Sections 405.2 and 405.4 of the New York State Codes, Rules, and Regulations (NYSDH, 2017). Sections 405.2 and 405.4 are outlined below in a (very slightly) abbreviated form; the full texts can be accessed using this link.
- Hospitals shall have evidence-based protocols for the early recognition and treatment of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock based on generally accepted standards of care as required by section 405.4(a).
- The medical staff shall adopt, implement, periodically update and submit to the department evidence-based protocols for the early recognition and treatment of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock (“sepsis protocols”) based on generally accepted standards of care. Sepsis protocols must include components specific to the identification, care, and treatment of adults and children and identify where and when components will differ for adults and children. These protocols must include the following components:
- (i) a process for the screening and early recognition of patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock;
- (ii) a process to identify and document individuals appropriate for treatment through severe sepsis and septic shock protocols, including explicit criteria defining those patients who should be excluded from the protocols, such as patients with certain clinical conditions or who have elected palliative care;
- (iii) guidelines for hemodynamic support with explicit physiologic and biomarker treatment goals, methodology for invasive or non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring, and timeframe goals;
- (iv) for infants and children, guidelines for fluid resuscitation with explicit timeframes for vascular access and fluid delivery consistent with current, evidence-based guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock with defined therapeutic goals;
- (v) a procedure for identification of the infectious source and delivery of early antibiotics with timeframe goals; and
- (vi) criteria for use, where appropriate, of an invasive protocol and the use of vasoactive agents.
- The medical staff shall adopt, implement, periodically update and submit to the department evidence-based protocols for the early recognition and treatment of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock (“sepsis protocols”) based on generally accepted standards of care. Sepsis protocols must include components specific to the identification, care, and treatment of adults and children and identify where and when components will differ for adults and children. These protocols must include the following components:
The medical staff shall ensure that staff with direct patient care responsibilities and, as appropriate, staff with indirect patient care responsibilities, including, but not limited to, laboratory and pharmacy staff, are periodically trained to implement sepsis protocols. The medical staff shall ensure updated training when the hospital initiates substantive protocol changes.
Hospitals shall submit the required sepsis protocols to the department for review. Hospitals must implement these protocols after receiving a letter from the department indicating that the proposed protocols have been reviewed and are consistent with the established criteria. Hospitals must update protocols based on newly emerging evidence-based standards. Unless the department identifies hospital-specific performance concerns, protocols are to be resubmitted at the department's request, not more frequently than once every two years.
The medical staff shall collect, use, and report quality measures related to recognizing and treating severe sepsis for internal quality improvement and hospital reporting to the department. Such measures shall include, but not be limited to, data to evaluate each hospital’s adherence rate to its sepsis protocols, including adherence to timeframes and implementation of all protocol components for adults and children.
Hospitals shall submit data specified by the department to permit the department to develop risk-adjusted severe sepsis and septic shock mortality rates in consultation with appropriate national, hospital, and expert stakeholders. Such data shall be reported annually or more frequently at the department's request and be subject to audit at the department's discretion.
As sepsis is caused by infection, New York state has infection control education outlined in New York State Law 6505-B and Section 239 of the New York State Public Health Law.
New York State Law 6505-B mandates infection control education for dental hygienists, dentists, licensed practical nurses, optometrists, podiatrists, and registered nurses practicing in the state (NYSDH, 2017).
Section 239 of the New York State Public Health Law states:
- (a) Every physician, physician assistant, and specialist assistant practicing in the state shall, on or before July first, nineteen hundred ninety-four, and every four years after that, complete coursework or training appropriate to the professional's practice approved by the department regarding infection control and barrier precautions, including engineering and work practice controls, per regulatory standards promulgated by the department in consultation with the department of education, to prevent the transmission of HIV, HBV or HCV in the course of professional practice. Such coursework or training must also be completed by every medical student, medical resident, and physician assistant student in the state as part of the orientation programs conducted by medical schools, medical residency programs, and physician assistant programs.
- (b) Every physician, physician assistant, specialist assistant, medical student, medical resident, and physician assistant student must provide documentation demonstrating the completion of and competence in the coursework or training required.
Implementation of these measures has been beneficial. The New York State Report on Sepsis Care Improvement Initiative: Hospital Quality Performance (published in 2019) reported that hospitals had improved the initiation of sepsis protocols and the early treatment protocols, and mortality rates have improved. The adult mortality rate decreased to 25.4% from 30.2%; the pediatric mortality rate fluctuated from 6.8% in quarter two of 2014 to 5.3% in quarter one of 2015, to a low of 6.5% in quarter three of 2015 (NYSDH, 2017).
Signs and Symptoms of Sepsis: Early Identification for Early Treatment
Coordinated efforts to improve sepsis detection and treatment positively impact patient survival. Performance improvement programs like the New York state program improve compliance with sepsis care guidelines and decrease patient mortality (Evans et al., 2021).
Early identification and, thus, early treatment of sepsis is critically important; this point is repeatedly stressed in the medical literature. A 2017 article that used data from 2014 – 2016 and reported to the New York State Department of Health reinforced this as early initiation of antibiotic therapy decreased the mortality rate (Seymour et al., 2017). Many therapies for treating sepsis, particularly antibiotic therapy and fluid resuscitation, are recommended to be given within the first few hours of treatment. Late administration increases mortality risk (Schmidt & Mandel, 2022). Early identification of sepsis involves:
Knowing the risk factors for sepsis
Knowing the signs and symptoms of sepsis
Age < 1 year or ≥ 65 years Immunosuppression Cancer COPD Diabetes HIV infection
Signs and Symptoms
The signs and symptoms of sepsis include, but are not limited to:
- Clinical and diagnostic/laboratory findings consistent with the source of infection
- Altered mental status, acute kidney injury, and other signs of organ dysfunction
- Some clinicians recommend using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system (Gotur, 2018). The SOFA scale measures blood pressure, the Glasgow coma score, serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, platelet count, and PaO2/FiO2. Each of these is given a score of 0 – 4. Based on the result/measurement, the scores are added, and the total score is used to identify patients with a high risk for mortality.
Sepsis is characterized by a very high or very low fever, a rapid heart rate, and a general sense of not feeling well, which happen in the context of an infection.
The Sepsis Alliance uses the mnemonic TIME as an educational device to teach people about the signs and symptoms of sepsis (Sepsis Alliance, n.d.).
- T = Temperature, high or low
- I – Infection
- M = Mental decline, the change in mental status that occurs with the decreased perfusion that occurs with severe sepsis
- E = Extremely ill
Seek medical attention immediately; do not wait. If someone has sepsis, nothing can be done at home to improve the situation, and delaying treatment is dangerous.
Sepsis often begins outside the hospital, but public awareness of sepsis is very low (Jabaley et al., 2018). Early recognition and treatment are critically important, so educating patients, families, caregivers, and the public about sepsis is important.
The lay public will often not have the technical background to understand the complexities of sepsis, but that is not a hindrance to providing them with accurate information that is simple to use and has practical benefits. Any basic educational program about sepsis should include sections on the seriousness of sepsis, causes of sepsis, signs, and symptoms, what to do if you suspect someone has sepsis, and sepsis prevention. The following information provides a framework for such a program.
- Make sure that vaccinations are up to date
- Practice good wound care
- If you have an infection, follow the self-care instructions you have been given by your healthcare provider, especially for the use of antibiotics
- Practice good handwashing
- If you live with someone who is immune compromised, get advice and guidance from your healthcare provider about how to prevent infections and sepsis
Healthcare professionals must adhere to scientifically accepted infection control standards and be responsible for monitoring subordinates' infection control practices. Incorporating work practice controls and engineering controls helps avoid or reduce exposure to potentially infectious materials and hazards. Compliance with environmental infection control measures will decrease healthcare-related infections among patients, especially the immunocompromised, and healthcare professionals.
- Alfulayw, K. H., Al-Otaibi, S. T., & Alqahtani, H. A. (2021). Factors associated with needlestick injuries among healthcare workers: implications for prevention. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). Visit Source.
- American Academy of Pediatrics (2021). American Academy of Pediatrics. Respiratory syncytial virus. In: Red Book: 2021-2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 32nd ed, Kimberlin DW, Barnett ED, Lynfield R, Sawyer MH (Eds), American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL 2021. p.628.
- American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACCN). (2016). Aspiration prevention. September 15, 2016. Accessed July 21, 2022. Visit Source.
- Andrés, M., García, M.C., Fajardo, A., Grau, L., Pagespetit, L., Plasencia, V., Martínez, I., Abadía, C., Sanahuja, A., & Bella, F. (2022). Nosocomial outbreak of COVID-19 in an internal medicine ward: Probable airborne transmission. Revista Clínica Española (English Edition). Visit Source.
- Bardorf, M. H., Jäger, B., Boeckmans, E., Kramer, A., & Assadian, O. (2016). Influence of material properties on gloves’ bacterial barrier efficacy in the presence of microperforation. American Journal of Infection Control, 44(12), 1645–1649. Visit Source.
- Bhatta, D. R., Koirala, S., Baral, A., Amatya, N. M., Parajuli, S., Shrestha, R., Hamal, D., Nayak, N., & Gokhale, S. (2022). Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Contamination of Frequently Touched Objects in Intensive Care Units: Potential Threat of Nosocomial Infections. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 2022, 1–6. Visit Source.
- Brunet, J., Lemoine, J.-P., Lefebvre, N., Denis, J., Pfaff, A. W., Abou-Bacar, A., Traub, R. J., Pesson, B., & Candolfi, E. (2015). Bloody Diarrhea Associated with Hookworm Infection in Traveler Returning to France from Myanmar. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 21(10), 1878–1879. Visit Source.
- Budd, A. P., Wentworth, D. E., Blanton, L., Elal, A. I. A., Alabi, N., Barnes, J., Brammer, L., Burns, E., Cummings, C. N., Davis, T., Flannery, B., Fry, A. M., Garg, S., Garten, R., Gubareva, L., Jang, Y., Kniss, K., Kramer, N., Lindstrom, S., & Mustaquim, D. (2018). Update: Influenza Activity — United States, October 1, 2017–February 3, 2018. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(6), 169–179. Visit Source.
- Bykov, I., Dyachenko, O., Ratmanov, P., Liu, H., Liang, L., & Wu, Q. (2022). Factors contributing to the high prevalence of multidrug-resistance/Rifampicin-resistance in patients with tuberculosis: an epidemiological cross sectional and qualitative study from Khabarovsk krai region of Russia. BMC Infectious Diseases, 22(1). Visit Source.
- Calderwood, A. H., Day, L. W., Muthusamy, V. R., Collins, J., Hambrick, R. D., Brock, A. S., Guda, N. M., Buscaglia, J. M., Petersen, B. T., Buttar, N. S., Khanna, L. G., Kushnir, V. M., Repaka, A., Villa, N. A., & Eisen, G. M. (2018). ASGE guideline for infection control during GI endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 87(5), 1167– 1179. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette in Healthcare Settings. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Parasites – Scabies. Accessed July 17, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Safe Injection Practices to Prevent Transmission of Infections to Patients. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Parasites – Enterobiasis Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Accessed July 16, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015a). Components of a Protective Environment. Accessed July 23, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015b). Investigation and Control of Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA): 2015 Update. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016a). Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR TB) Fact Sheet. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016b). Recommended Vaccines for Healthcare Workers. Accessed July 20, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016c). Summary of Infection Prevention Practices in Dental Settings: Basic Expectations for Safe Care. Atlanta. Accessed July 21, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018a). Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infections. Clinical Features and Complications. Accessed July 16, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018b). Polio Vaccination Recommendations for Specific Groups. Accessed July 20, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019a). Acinetobacter in Healthcare Settings. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019b). Adenoviruses. Accessed July 23, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019c). Clinicians: Information About CRE. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019d). Cryptosporidiosis. Accessed July 4, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019e). Human Parainfluenza Viruses (HPIVs). Clinical Overview. Accessed July 23, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019f). Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Accessed July 17, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control/National Occupational Research Agenda (2019g). Sharps Injuries: Bloodborne Pathogens. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019h). TB Infection Control in Healthcare Settings. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019i). Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) in Healthcare Settings. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019j). Yersinia enterocolitica (Yersiniosis). Accessed July 4, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020a). C. gattii Infection. Risk & Prevention. Accessed July 3, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020b). C. neoformans Infection. Risk & Prevention. Accessed July 3, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020c). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Congenital CMV Infection. Accessed July 4, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020d). Hepatitis C. Questions and Answers for Health Professionals. Accessed July 5, 2020. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020e). Hepatitis E. Accessed July 5, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020f). Lyme Disease. Accessed July 15, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020g). Parasites - Trichinellosis (also known as Trichinosis). Accessed July 17, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020h). Questions and Answers for Health Professionals. Accessed July 5, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020i). Rubella (German Measles, Three-Day Measles). Accessed July 17, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020j). Shigella - Shigellosis. Accessed July 4, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020k). Tetanus. Accessed July 17, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020l). Tuberculosis. Fact Sheet: Respiratory Protection in Health-Care Settings. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021a). Campylobacter (Campylobacteriosis). Accessed July 4, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021b). Chicken Pox (Varicella). Accessed July 3, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021c). Genital Herpes – CDC Detailed Fact Sheet. Accessed July 15, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021d). Hand Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD). Accessed July 5, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021e). Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021f). Information for Healthcare Professionals about Histoplasmosis. Accessed July 15, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021g). Legionella (Legionnaire’s Disease and Pontiac Fever). Accessed July 15, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021h). Parasites - Amebiasis - Entamoeba histolytica Infection. Accessed July 3, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021i). Parasites – Giardia. Accessed July 5, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021j). People at Higher Risk of Flu Complications. Accessed July 23, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021k). Personal Protective Equipment – Questions and Answers. Accessed July 19, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021l). Prevention Strategies for Seasonal Influenza in Healthcare Settings. Guidelines and Recommendations. Accessed July 23, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021m). Rabies. Accessed July 16, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021n). Rotavirus. Accessed July 17, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021o). Strategies for Optimizing the Supply of N95 Respirators. Accessed July 19, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021p). Typhoid Fever and Paratyphoid Fever. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022a). Cholera - Vibrio cholerae infection. Accessed July 3, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022b). Disease Burden of Flu. Accessed July 23, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022c). Gonorrhea – Detailed Fact Sheet. Accessed July 5, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022d). Group A Streptococcal (GAS) Disease. Accessed July 17, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022e). Hepatitis B Questions and Answers for Health Professionals. Accessed July 5, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022f). How To Use Your N-95 Respirator. Accessed July 19, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022g). Impetigo. Accessed July 15, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022h). Information for Healthcare Professionals About Aspergillosis. Accessed July 23, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022i). Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. Accessed July 20, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022j). Listeria (Listeriosis). Accessed July 15, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022k). Malaria. Accessed July 16, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022l). Monkey Pox. Accessed July 24, 2022, from Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022m). Monkeypox. Monitoring People Who Have Been Exposed. Accessed July 24, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022n). Pneumococcal Disease. Accessed July 16, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022o). Salmonella. Accessed July 4, 2022. Visit Source.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022j). Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs). Syphilis – Detailed Fact Sheet. Accessed July 17, 2022. Visit Source.
- Choi, J. S., & Kim, K. M. (2016). Predictors of respiratory hygiene/cough etiquette in a large community in Korea: A descriptive study. American journal of infection control, 44(11), e271–e273. Visit Source.
- Ciccarese, G., Drago, F., Rebora, A., & Parodi, A. (2021). Updates on lymphogranuloma venereum. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV, 35(8), 1606–1607. Visit Source.
- Clark E, & Akamine C, & Shandera W.X. (2022). Adenovirus infections. Papadakis M.A., & McPhee S.J., & Rabow M.W., & McQuaid K.R.(Eds.), Current Medical Diagnosis & Treatment 2022. McGraw Hill. Visit Source.
- Cohen J.I. (2014). Epstein-barr virus infections, including infectious mononucleosis. Kasper D, & Fauci A, & Hauser S, & Longo D, & Jameson J, & Loscalzo J(Eds.), Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 19e. McGraw Hill. Visit Source.
- Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) (2022). Infection prevention requirements for the medical care of immunosuppressed patients: recommendations of the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch Institute. GMS hygiene and infection control, 17, Doc07. Visit Source.
- Cong, Y., Yang, S., & Rao, X. (2019). Vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: A review of case updating and clinical features. Journal of advanced research, 21, 169–176. Visit Source.
- Corsino, C.B., Ali, R. & Linklater, D.R. (2022). Herpangia In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Visit Source.
- Crowe, Jr. J.E. (2022). Common viral respiratory infections, including covid-19. Loscalzo J, & Fauci A, & Kasper D, & Hauser S, & Longo D, & Jameson J(Eds.), Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 21e. McGraw Hill. Visit Source.
- Curry S. R. (2017). Clostridium difficile. Clinics in laboratory medicine, 37(2), 341–369. Visit Source.
- Dionne-Odom, J., Cozzi, G. D., Franco, R. A., Njei, B., & Tita, A. (2022). Treatment and prevention of viral hepatitis in pregnancy. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 226(3), 335–346. Visit Source.
- Dolan, S. A., Arias, K. M., Felizardo, G., Barnes, S., Kraska, S., Patrick, M., & Bumsted, A. (2016). APIC position paper: Safe injection, infusion, and medication vial practices in health care. American journal of infection control, 44(7), 750–757. Visit Source.
- Dulon, M., Stranzinger, J., Wendeler, D., & Nienhaus, A. (2020). Causes of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries When Using Devices with and without Safety Features. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(23), 8721. Visit Source.
- Egro, F. M., Nwaiwu, C. A., Smith, S., Harper, J. D., & Spiess, A. M. (2017). Seroconversion rates among health care workers exposed to hepatitis C virus-contaminated body fluids: The University of Pittsburgh 13-year experience. American journal of infection control, 45(9), 1001–1005. Visit Source.
- Eichel, V. M., Brandt, C., Brandt, J., Jabs, J. M., & Mutters, N. T. (2022). Is virtual reality suitable for hand hygiene training in health care workers? Evaluating an application for acceptability and effectiveness. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 11(1). Visit Source.
- Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., Schorr, C., Simpson, S., Wiersinga, W. J., Alshamsi, F., Angus, D. C., Arabi, Y., Azevedo, L., Beale, R., Beilman, G., Belley-Cote, E., … Levy, M. (2021). Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive care medicine, 47(11), 1181–1247. Visit Source.
- Evashwick, E., Ben-Aderet, M. A., Almario, M. J., Madhusudhan, M. S., Raypon, R., Rome, S., Desvignes, K., Jessup, J., Fawcett, S., & Grein, J. D. (2022). A novel intervention: Implementation of a neutropenic infection-prevention bundle and audit tool in an oncology unit. American journal of infection control, 50(4), 454–458. Visit Source.
- Fauci A.S., & Folkers G.K., & Lane H (2018). Human immunodeficiency virus disease: aids and related disorders. Jameson J, & Fauci A.S., & Kasper D.L., & Hauser S.L., & Longo D.L., & Loscalzo J(Eds.), Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 20e. McGraw Hill. Visit Source.
- Fox-Lewis, A., Williamson, F., Harrower, J., Ren, X., Sonder, G., McNeill, A., de Ligt, J., & Geoghegan, J. L. (2022). Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant within Tightly Monitored Isolation Facility, New Zealand (Aotearoa). Emerging infectious diseases, 28(3), 501–509. Visit Source.
- Gardam M, & Hota S (2017). Tuberculosis. McKean S.C., & Ross J.J., & Dressler D.D., & Scheurer D.B.(Eds.), Principles and Practice of Hospital Medicine, 2e. McGraw Hill. Visit Source.
- Gastanaduy, P.A. Redd, S.B., Clemmons, N.S., Lee, A.D., Hickman, C.J., Rota, P.A. & Patel, M. (2019). Chapter 7: Measles. Accessed Jul 16, 2022, from Visit Source.
- Gotur D. B. (2018). Sepsis in a Panorama: What the Cardiovascular Physician Should Know. Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 14(2), 89–100. Visit Source.
- Goyal, H., Larsen, S., Perisetti, A., Larsen, N. B., Ockert, L. K., Adamsen, S., Tharian, B., & Thosani, N. (2022). Gastrointestinal endoscope contamination rates - elevators are not only to blame: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy international open, 10(6), E840–E853. Visit Source.
- Häfliger, E., Atkinson, A., & Marschall, J. (2020). Systematic review of healthcare- associated Burkholderia cepacia complex outbreaks: presentation, causes and outbreak control. Infection prevention in practice, 2(3), 100082. Visit Source.
- Hambridge, K., Endacott, R., & Nichols, A. (2022). Exploring the psychological effects of sharps injuries sustained by healthcare workers. Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987), 10.7748/ns.2022.e11785. Advance online publication. Visit Source.
- Jabaley, C. S., Blum, J. M., Groff, R. F., & O'Reilly-Shah, V. N. (2018). Global trends in the awareness of sepsis: insights from search engine data between 2012 and 2017. Critical care (London, England), 22(1), 7. Visit Source.
- Jankovska, N., Rusina, R., Bruzova, M., Parobkova, E., Olejar, T., & Matej, R. (2021). Human Prion Disorders: Review of the Current Literature and a Twenty-Year Experience of the National Surveillance Center in the Czech Republic. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 11(10), 1821. Visit Source.
- Karamchandani, U., Ahmed, U., Rufai, S. R., Tan, N., Tan, W., Petrushkin, H., & Solebo, A. L. (2022). Long-term ocular and visual outcomes following symptomatic and asymptomatic congenital CMV infection: a systematic review protocol. BMJ open, 12(5), e059038. Visit Source.
- Ke, Y., Ye, L., Zhu, P., Sun, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Listeriosis during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 22(1), 261. Visit Source.
- Kilinc Balci, F. S. (2016). Isolation gowns in health care settings: Laboratory studies, regulations and standards, and potential barriers of gown selection and use. American Journal of Infection Control, 44(1), 104–111. Visit Source.
- Kim, D., Lee, H., Choi, J. S., Croney, C. M., Park, K. S., Park, H. J., Cho, J., Son, S., Kim, J. Y., Choi, S. H., Huh, H. J., Ko, K. S., Lee, N. Y., & Kim, Y. J. (2022a). The Changes in Epidemiology of Imipenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Bacteremia in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit for 17 Years. Journal of Korean medical science, 37(24), e196. Visit Source.
- Kim, B. G., Kang, M., Lim, J., Lee, J., Kang, D., Kim, M., Kim, J., Park, H., Min, K. H., Cho, J., & Jeon, K. (2022b). Comprehensive risk assessment for hospital-acquired pneumonia: sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital environmental factors associated with the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia. BMC pulmonary medicine, 22(1), 21. Visit Source.
- Klompas, M. (2021). Risk factors and prevention of hospital-acquired and ventilator- associated pneumonia in adults. UpToDate. Accessed July 22, 2022. Visit Source.
- Klompas, M., Branson, R., Cawcutt, K., Crist, M., Eichenwald, E. C., Greene, L. R., Lee, G., Maragakis, L. L., Powell, K., Priebe, G. P., Speck, K., Yokoe, D. S., & Berenholtz, S. M. (2022). Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-associated events, and nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 43(6), 687–713. Visit Source.
- Klompas M. (2022). New Insights into the Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia/Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Caused by Viruses. Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine, 43(2), 295–303. Visit Source.
- Ko, R. E., Min, K. H., Hong, S. B., Baek, A. R., Lee, H. K., Cho, W. H., Kim, C., Chang, Y., Lee, S. S., Oh, J. Y., Lee, H. B., Bae, S., Moon, J. Y., Yoo, K. H., Jeon, K., & Korean HAP/VAP Study Group (2021). Characteristics, Management, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Multicenter Cohort Study in Korea. Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 84(4), 317–325. Visit Source.
- Koh, W. M., Bogich, T., Siegel, K., Jin, J., Chong, E. Y., Tan, C. Y., Chen, M. I., Horby, P., & Cook, A. R. (2016). The Epidemiology of Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease in Asia: A Systematic Review and Analysis. The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 35(10), e285– e300. Visit Source.
- Kuhar, D. T., Henderson, D. K., Struble, K. A., Heneine, W., Thomas, V., Cheever, L. W., Gomaa, A., Panlilio, A. L., & US Public Health Service Working Group (2013). Updated US Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to human immunodeficiency virus and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 34(9), 875–892. Visit Source.
- Lashinsky, J. N., Henig, O., Pogue, J. M., & Kaye, K. S. (2017). Minocycline for the Treatment of Multidrug and Extensively Drug-Resistant A. baumannii: A Review. Infectious diseases and therapy, 6(2), 199–211. Visit Source.
- Lautenschlager S, & Brockmeyer N.H. (2019). Chancroid. Kang S, & Amagai M, & Bruckner A.L., & Enk A.H., & Margolis D.J., & McMichael A.J., & Orringer J.S.(Eds.), Fitzpatrick's Dermatology, 9e. McGraw Hill. Visit Source.
- Lequilliec, N., Raymond, R., Vanjak, D., Baghdadi, N., Boulestreau, H., Zahar, J. R., & Gangneux, J. P. (2017). Practices of infectious control management during neutropenia: A survey from 149 French hospitals. Journal de mycologie medicale, 27(2), 227–231. Visit Source.
- Leroy S. (2013). Infectious risk of endovaginal and transrectal ultrasonography: systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of hospital infection, 83(2), 99–106. Visit Source.
- Loscalzo, J., Fauci, A., Kasper, D., Hauser, S., Longo, D., & Jameson, L. J. (2022). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, Twenty-First Edition (Vol.1 & Vol.2) (21st ed.). McGraw Hill / Medical.
- Lu, P. J., Hung, M. C., Srivastav, A., Grohskopf, L. A., Kobayashi, M., Harris, A. M., Dooling, K. L., Markowitz, L. E., Rodriguez-Lainz, A., & Williams, W. W. (2021). Surveillance of Vaccination Coverage Among Adult Populations -United States, 2018. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C.: 2002), 70(3), 1–26. Visit Source.
- Mbaeyi, S., Duffy, J. & McNamara, L.A. (2021). Meningococcal Disease. Accessed July 25, 2022. Visit Source.
- McKay, S. L., Vlachos, N., Daniels, J. B., Albrecht, V. S., Stevens, V. A., Rasheed, J. K., Johnson, J. K., Lutgring, J. D., Sjölund-Karlsson, M., & Halpin, A. L. (2022). Molecular Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the United States, 2013-2017. Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.), 28(6), 645–653. Visit Source.
- Miller, R. F., Huang, L., & Walzer, P. D. (2013). Pneumocystis pneumonia associated with human immunodeficiency virus. Clinics in chest medicine, 34(2), 229–241. Visit Source.
- Mo, Y., Pham, T. M., Lim, C., Horby, P., Stewardson, A. J., Harbarth, S., Scott, G. M., & Cooper, B. S. (2022). The effect of hand hygiene frequency on reducing acute respiratory infections in the community: a meta-analysis. Epidemiology and infection, 150, e79. Visit Source.
- Modi, A. R., & Kovacs, C. S. (2020). Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: Diagnosis, management, and prevention. Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine, 87(10), 633–639. Visit Source.
- Moorman, A. C., de Perio, M. A., Goldschmidt, R., Chu, C., Kuhar, D., Henderson, D. K., Naggie, S., Kamili, S., Spradling, P. R., Gordon, S. C., Russi, M. B., & Teshale, E. H. (2020). Testing and Clinical Management of Health Care Personnel Potentially Exposed to Hepatitis C Virus - CDC Guidance, United States, 2020. MMWR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports, 69(6), 1–8. Visit Source.
- Naggie, S., Holland, D. P., Sulkowski, M. S., & Thomas, D. L. (2017). Hepatitis C Virus Postexposure Prophylaxis in the Healthcare Worker: Why Direct-Acting Antivirals Don't Change a Thing. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 64(1), 92–99. Visit Source.
- National Clinician Consultation Center. (2021). PEP Quick Guide for Occupational Exposures. Accessed July 24, 2022. Visit Source.
- Neill, S., & Dean, N. (2019). Aspiration pneumonia and pneumonitis: a spectrum of infectious/noninfectious diseases affecting the lung. Current opinion in infectious diseases, 32(2), 152–157. Visit Source.
- New York State Education Department. (2011). General provisions for health professions. Accessed July 1, 2022. Visit Source.
- New York State Department of Health (2018a). Frequently Asked Questions - Infection Control Training Syllabus Update (September 2018). Accessed July 1, 2022. Visit Source.
- New York State Department of Health and State Education Department. (2018b). Infection Control Training Syllabus – 2018. Accessed July 1, 2022. Visit Source.
- New York State Department of Health. (2019). Health Care Provider Infection Control Training. Accessed July 7, 2022. Visit Source.
- NIOSH. Alert: Preventing needle stick injuries in healthcare settings. (2000). Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Nwaiwu, C. A., Egro, F. M., Smith, S., Harper, J. D., & Spiess, A. M. (2017). Seroconversion rate among health care workers exposed to HIV-contaminated body fluids: The University of Pittsburgh 13-year experience. American journal of infection control, 45(8), 896–900. Visit Source.
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2011) Standard 1910.1030 - Bloodborne pathogens. Accessed July 19, 2022. Visit Source.
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (ND). Legionellosis (Legionnaires' Disease and Pontiac Fever). Accessed July 23, 2022. Visit Source.
- Ottino, M. C., Argentero, A., Argentero, P. A., Garzaro, G., & Zotti, C. M. (2019). Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices. BMJ open, 9(11), e030576. Visit Source.
- Pannewick, B., Baier, C., Schwab, F., & Vonberg, R. P. (2021). Infection control measures in nosocomial MRSA outbreaks-Results of a systematic analysis. PloS one, 16(4), e0249837. Visit Source.
- Patterson, T. F., Thompson, G. R., 3rd, Denning, D. W., Fishman, J. A., Hadley, S., Herbrecht, R., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Marr, K. A., Morrison, V. A., Nguyen, M. H., Segal, B. H., Steinbach, W. J., Stevens, D. A., Walsh, T. J., Wingard, J. R., Young, J. A., & Bennett, J. E. (2016). Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 63(4), e1–e60. Visit Source.
- Pokala, H. R., Leonard, D., Cox, J., Metcalf, P., McClay, J., Siegel, J., & Winick, N. (2014). Association of hospital construction with the development of healthcare associated environmental mold infections (HAEMI) in pediatric patients with leukemia. Pediatric blood & cancer, 61(2), 276–280. Visit Source.
- Rathore, S. S., Sathiyamoorthy, J., Lalitha, C., & Ramakrishnan, J. (2022). A holistic review on Cryptococcus neoformans. Microbial pathogenesis, 166, 105521. Visit Source.
- Rutala, W. A., & Weber, D. J. (2016). Disinfection and Sterilization in Health Care Facilities: An Overview and Current Issues. Infectious disease clinics of North America, 30(3), 609–637. Visit Source.
- Rutala, W.A., & Weber, D. J. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). (2019). Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008. Update: May 2019. Accessed July 20, 2022. Visit Source.
- Ryan, K.J. (2022). Chapter 25: Streptococci and Enterococci. In: Sherris & Ryan's Medical Microbiology, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill Education. Online edition. Accessed July 18, 2022. Visit Source.
- Scheithauer, S., Batzer, B., Dangel, M., Passweg, J., & Widmer, A. (2017). Workload even affects hand hygiene in a highly trained and well-staffed setting: a prospective 365/7/24 observational study. The Journal of hospital infection, 97(1), 11–16. Visit Source.
- Schillie, S., Murphy, T. V., Sawyer, M., Ly, K., Hughes, E., Jiles, R., de Perio, M. A., Reilly, M., Byrd, K., Ward, J. W., & Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2013). CDC guidance for evaluating health-care personnel for hepatitis B virus protection and for administering postexposure management. MMWR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports, 62(RR-10), 1–19.
- Schillie, S., Vellozzi, C., Reingold, A., Harris, A., Haber, P., Ward, J. W., & Nelson, N. P. (2018). Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports, 67(1), 1– 31. Visit Source.
- Schirmer, A., Sessions, R., Gravenstein, N., Rand, K., Oli, M., Cooper, L. A., & Sappenfield, J. W. (2020). Isolation gowns as a potential work hazard. Annals of work exposures and health, 64(6), 596–603. Visit Source.
- Schmidt, G.A. & Mandel, J. (2022). Evaluation and management of suspected sepsis and septic shock in adults. UpToDate. Accessed July 25, 2022. Visit Source.
- Sebastiani, F. R., Dym, H., & Kirpalani, T. (2017). Infection Control in the Dental Office. Dental clinics of North America, 61(2), 435–457. Visit Source.
- Sehulster L., Chinn R.W. (2003). Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR Recommendations and Reports,52(RR-10),1- 42. Visit Source.
- Siegel J.D., Rhinehart E., Jackson M., Chiarello L. (2007). Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings. Accessed July 19, 2022. Visit Source.
- Sepsis Alliance. (ND). What is Sepsis? Accessed July 25, 2022. Visit Source.
- Seymour, C. W., Gesten, F., Prescott, H. C., Friedrich, M. E., Iwashyna, T. J., Phillips, G. S., Lemeshow, S., Osborn, T., Terry, K. M., & Levy, M. M. (2017). Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis. The New England journal of medicine, 376(23), 2235–2244. Visit Source.
- Shenoy, E. S., & Weber, D. J. (2021). Occupational Health Update: Evaluation and Management of Exposures and Postexposure Prophylaxis. Infectious disease clinics of North America, 35(3), 735–754. Visit Source.
- The Joint Commission. (2017). Instrument Reprocessing - Immediate Use Steam Sterilization (IUSS). What are important considerations associated with Immediate-Use Steam Sterilization? Accessed July 21, 2022. Visit Source.
- Tissera, K. A., Williams, A., Perry, J., Kawai, K., Kenna, M., & Mankarious, L. A. (2022). Hearing Stability in Patients With Unilateral Hearing Loss Due to Congenital CMV. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery: official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 167(4), 739–744. Visit Source.
- Treviño, H., 2nd, & Romero Arenas, M. A. (2020). Systematic Review of Blood-Borne Pathogen Exposure Rates Among Medical Students. The Journal of surgical research, 255, 66–70. Visit Source.
- U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). (2015). Reprocessing Medical Devices in Health Care Settings: Validation Methods and Labeling Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Accessed July 21, 2022. Visit Source.
- U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). (2022). Medical Gowns. Accessed July 19, 2022. Visit Source.
- Verbeek, J. H., Ijaz, S., Mischke, C., Ruotsalainen, J. H., Mäkelä, E., Neuvonen, K., Edmond, M. B., Sauni, R., Kilinc Balci, F. S., & Mihalache, R. C. (2016). Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 4, CD011621. Visit Source.
- Weber, D. J. (2020). Prevention of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection among health care providers. UpToDate. Accessed July 24, 2022. Visit Source.
- Wilkinson, M., Ormandy, K., Bradley, C. R., Fraise, A. P., & Hines, J. (2017). Dose considerations for alcohol-based hand rubs. The Journal of hospital infection, 95(2), 175– 182. Visit Source.
- Wingard, J.R. (2022). Prevention of infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. UpToDate. Accessed July 25, 2022. Visit Source.
- World Health Organization (2009). WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Healthcare. Accessed July 24, 2022. Visit Source.
- World Health Organization (2020). Sepsis. August 26, 2020. Accessed July 25, 2022. Visit Source.
- Zayas, G., Chiang, M. C., Wong, E., MacDonald, F., Lange, C. F., Senthilselvan, A., & King, M. (2013). Effectiveness of cough etiquette maneuvers in disrupting the chain of transmission of infectious respiratory diseases. BMC public health, 13, 811. Visit Source.